How do you know they aren't getting a fucking move on?Not so sure about sporting reasons - international breaks and the like - though. If the panel cared that much about sporting implications they would have got a fucking move on to save us from all this waiting.
He’s clearly got a lot to offer in terms of expertise in his field. And we aren’t the only club going through an investigation. Plus financial rules will always be a subject in modern football. And good luck to him.My question is this.
I wonder if slbsn will still dine out with Jordan after this is all over????
The main question should be, how can you not punch the slimy gobshite in the face the moment he spouts his shit, the guy nearly ruined Crystal Palace; he should have zero credit in anything to do with finances.My question is this.
I wonder if slbsn will still dine out with Jordan after this is all over????
Ya got me. I'm lying.
Welcome to the Ignore list.
How do you know they aren't getting a fucking move on?
Like i insisted, there was no timeline suggested when this started, so in my opinion it cannot be called overdue.
They will likely have had other already-planned work commitments along the way and could well be doing their absolute utmost best to get our result typed up when they have the chance.
In their minds they might be ahead of schedule, nobody knows.
I would love to smack that posh little wet wipeThe main question should be, how can you not punch the slimy gobshite in the face, the moment he spouts his shit, the guy nearly ruined Crystal Palace; he should have zero credit in anything to do with finances.
You've got the wrong end of the stick due to your obvious confirmation bias.I have always wondered if the time line is affected by if all allegations are not proven and that the public will only find out when everything has been considered and compensation applied.
Only think this as people have said there would be further tribunal/meetings (part b) if everything is not proven and releasing info after part a before b just leaves people wondering what will happen. Of course with no part b the time line would just be part a is taking this long.
I have always wondered if the time line is affected by if any allegations are proven and that the public will only find out when everything has been considered and sanctions applied.
Only think this as people have said there would be further tribunal/meetings (part b) if anything is proven and releasing info after part a before b just leaves people wondering what will happen. Of course with no part b the time line would just be part a is taking this long.
Really?Article about it in the poorly named 'Independent' by Delaney this morning. Says absolutely fuck all.
It’s got to the point that nobody can see through the wood for the trees.I have always wondered if the time line is affected by if any allegations are proven and that the public will only find out when everything has been considered and sanctions applied.
Only think this as people have said there would be further tribunal/meetings (part b) if anything is proven and releasing info after part a before b just leaves people wondering what will happen. Of course with no part b the time line would just be part a is taking this long.
It’s got to the point that nobody can see through the wood for the trees.
This is what happens when you try to conger up evidence of alleged financial malpractice from over 15 years ago. I would think that even the panel are reading their findings and cannot clearly determine for themselves , one way or the other any , any clear links to either guilt or innocence .
In that case , we arrive at this point today no nearer to resolution.
What an absolute shambles from the Premier League this has been.
Nothing more than a smear campaign with financial greed tinged with more than a touch of institutional racism thrown in for good luck.
It’s fuckin boring now to us blues, let alone the rest of the football fraternity ( other than the red shirts and the yid army).
A smear campaign, nothing more, nothing less.
I think we might just notice when Rochdale rock up for the opening game of next season :-)I have always wondered if the time line is affected by if any allegations are proven and that the public will only find out when everything has been considered and sanctions applied.
Only think this as people have said there would be further tribunal/meetings (part b) if anything is proven and releasing info after part a before b just leaves people wondering what will happen. Of course with no part b the time line would just be part a is taking this long.
Most certainly our owners will have sussed her involvement out one way or the otherI do think she’s mixed up in it. Despite 4 years of back & to & the charges going nowhere she turns up & we are hammered within weeks. I think we’ll be cleared & want a clear out but the spin could be, they failed to nail us so are incompetent & need to go. Same result but subtle media spin.
They don’t need to determine innocence.