The Labour Government

Pancake Arse said:
1763198782706.png
Click to expand...
He’s a ****, a very rich one at that.
 
Thoughts on the asylum seeker question. Is it right to take the stance that these people shouldn’t be given a permanent pass, and having to move back when conditions are right?

Seems sensible to me. I always thought that if something happened in the UK that put my life, and family at risk, I’d try to get to Canada or Australia where I have family, lesser to Germany, Belgium or Netherlands, where we have friends. But, when clear, I’d expect to come back home.
 
The Future’s Blue! said:
Thoughts on the asylum seeker question. Is it right to take the stance that these people shouldn’t be given a permanent pass, and having to move back when conditions are right?

Seems sensible to me. I always thought that if something happened in the UK that put my life, and family at risk, I’d try to get to Canada or Australia where I have family, lesser to Germany, Belgium or Netherlands, where we have friends. But, when clear, I’d expect to come back home.
Click to expand...
I'd try and get to Liverpool. Only an hour away and not part of the UK.

I'd be off like a shot as soon as I could get back though.
 
metalblue said:
Policy is to address a specific issue, a plan are the actions/steps to achieve an objective.

Let’s take the renters rights bill you mentioned, what is the point of the bill? To improve renters rights, ok so why is that a good thing? Because it’s the right thing to do to help those whose housing situation is vunerable. Ok great, its seems like a good thing to me but it’s a policy to support an ideology (other ideologies on renters are available).

You could say that Reeves’s “fiscal rules” on the economy are a plan. What’s missing is the coherent steps to get to that goal, and, believe it or not, this government is more interest in social issues than businesses which doesn’t usually lend itself well to a coherent economic policy.

The way I read your second paragraph said the budget problems that Reeves faces are all down to the Tories, you stated it as fact (which is wrong) but in your first sentence you’d complained about political commentators stating things as fact when they don’t actually know. I may have misread what you meant of course.
Click to expand...
I don’t get what your saying about the renters rights bill it’s a policy to achieve there plans for renters / fairer society or whatever you want to call it. Not sure why you missed that end step which was the logical conclusion of what you were saying and instead mentioned ideology. Ideology could be part of your plan, government X wants a conservative / Marxist / socialists society and X why or z is part the plan to achieve it.

There was a blackhole they didn’t know about in the last budget which was the fault of the last lot that had to be filled. (So your wrong ) That has nothing to do with what commentators are guessing may be in the next budget so I still don’t follow your point and your clearly don’t know since did not understand what I was saying.

As for the comments about Reeves she has more in a budget that meeting the rules. She had the tax and spend element which are designed to meet those rules.

Then there is the wider ideology behind it which is clearly a fairer society and more investment in public and private sector and higher growth that could follow from that

By the way I am not saying this lot are perfect or even have a full plan I just don’t believe they have no plan because people say so they don’t even back it up
 
Last edited:
BlueAnorak said:
Muslim herritage if you like.
There are places in the UK where Labour lost safe seats at the last election - to Greens and Ethnic Muslims most being modererate islamists at the very least except one.
Click to expand...
Being Muslim doesn’t make you an Islamic or Islamist MP in the way you seem to be saying. Are Jewish MPs MPs who are Jewish or MPs who happen to be Jewish or what about Christians ? You wouldn’t say it about these other groups and you would very quickly be called anti semitic if you did so don’t be Islamophobic
 
The Future’s Blue! said:
Thoughts on the asylum seeker question. Is it right to take the stance that these people shouldn’t be given a permanent pass, and having to move back when conditions are right?

Seems sensible to me. I always thought that if something happened in the UK that put my life, and family at risk, I’d try to get to Canada or Australia where I have family, lesser to Germany, Belgium or Netherlands, where we have friends. But, when clear, I’d expect to come back home.
Click to expand...
and what happens if you have been settled for decades-bought a house, got a career, had children....

Its just another cruel policy by labour trying to stave off reform-when all they achieve by keep talking about it is push more of the fools to choose Reform.
 
The Stockport Iniesta said:
I'd try and get to Liverpool. Only an hour away and not part of the UK.

I'd be off like a shot as soon as I could get back though.
Click to expand...
I would prefer to keep my options open, Denmark is a bit cold, the Aussies a tad uncouth, America is obviously a no go. Im thinking if one has to flee then it seems fair to dip a toe in a few places before a decision has to be made.

South facing garden is a must though.
 
hilts said:
I would prefer to keep my options open, Denmark is a bit cold, the Aussies a tad uncouth, America is obviously a no go. Im thinking if one has to flee then it seems fair to dip a toe in a few places before a decision has to be made.

South facing garden is a must though.
Click to expand...
Does that not rather preclude southern hemisphere options?
 
bert38 said:
and what happens if you have been settled for decades-bought a house, got a career, had children....

Its just another cruel policy by labour trying to stave off reform-when all they achieve by keep talking about it is push more of the fools to choose Reform.
Click to expand...
If you know up front that your stay is not guaranteed, then it is upon that individual if they want to take such a chance on having a family
 
So are tough, strong immigration policies now a good thing?

Asking for those who have been called racist and bigoted for thinking like that for a bit longer than the sudden converts.

Imagine daring to question someone coming here from a safe country illegally, and asking for them to be sent back, called out for it and to now see a Labour Home Secretary say she will bring such a rule in and it barely even raising an eyebrow on here.
 
blueinsa said:
So are tough, strong immigration policies now a good thing?

Asking for those who have been called racist and bigoted for thinking like that for a bit longer than the sudden converts.

Imagine daring to question someone coming here from a safe country illegally, and asking for them to be sent back, called out for it and to now see a Labour Home Secretary say she will bring such a rule in and it barely even raising an eyebrow on here.
Click to expand...
I will. It stinks-its also a pathetic attempt to ape reform whilst losing people that actually vote for them-like me.

Constantly talking about this issue like its the panacea to every problem in this country only reinforces reform's one policy position.
 
bert38 said:
I will. It stinks-its also a pathetic attempt to ape reform whilst losing people that actually vote for them-like me.

Constantly talking about this issue like its the panacea to every problem in this country only reinforces reform's one policy position.
Click to expand...

You’re in an ever decreasing minority.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top