dadnlad
Well-Known Member
There two outstanding pointsToyah Wilcox ;)
They need turn heating on in that kitchen
There two outstanding pointsToyah Wilcox ;)
So I went on to ask to ask about the appeal process and how long it could extend this case.CoPilot this morning says...
The verdict on Manchester City’s 115 Premier League charges has been repeatedly delayed. Here’s the latest:
Why the delay?
- The independent commission hearing concluded in December 2024, but no decision has been announced yet.
- Multiple reports suggest the Premier League initially hoped for a ruling in spring or summer 2025, then during the October international break (4–18 October). However, that window passed without an outcome.
- As of mid-November 2025, insiders say the decision is still pending, partly due to internal Premier League politics (e.g., debate over chair Alison Brittain’s future) and the complexity of the case. There is no confirmed date, and some sources warn it could drag into 2026, especially if appeals follow. [onefootball.com], [manchester...news.co.uk], [express.co.uk]
- The case involves alleged breaches from 2009–2018, including inaccurate financial reporting and non-cooperation.
- Legal processes are slow, and the Premier League has no control over the independent panel’s timeline.
- Any verdict will likely trigger appeals, meaning the saga could continue well beyond the initial ruling. [sportbible.com], [si.com]
Bottom line: There is no official announcement date, but the earliest realistic expectation now seems to be sometime in 2026, unless the commission surprises everyone with a decision soon.
Sorry chaps...

It is wrong in a number of respects. In fact, most of it is wrong. Ignore.So I went on to ask to ask about the appeal process and how long it could extend this case.
Naturally even Copilot assumed the PL would win (FFS)...
1. Initial Verdict
2. Right to Appeal
- The independent commission delivers its ruling on the 115 charges.
- If Manchester City are found guilty, sanctions could include fines, points deductions, or even expulsion from the league.
3. Potential Escalation
- Manchester City can appeal the decision to an independent appeal board appointed by the Premier League.
- This board is separate from the original commission and reviews the case from scratch, considering evidence and arguments again.
4. Timeline Impact
- If City lose the appeal, they can take the matter to UK courts under arbitration law.
- In extreme cases, they could escalate to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), especially if UEFA-related implications arise.
Overall Estimate
- Appeal board stage: Could take 6–12 months after the initial verdict.
- Court challenges: Add another 12–18 months, depending on complexity.
- CAS involvement: Adds 6–12 months more if pursued.
So naturally I then asked "what about if manchester city win?"
- If the verdict comes in early 2026, the full process (including appeals) could push the final resolution into 2027 or beyond.
If Manchester City win the case (i.e., all or most charges are dismissed), here’s what happens:
(here's the interesting bit...)
- The independent commission clears City of wrongdoing.
- No sanctions (points deduction, fines, or expulsion) are applied.
- The Premier League bears the reputational hit for a lengthy and costly investigation.
- The Premier League cannot appeal to overturn the verdict because the commission is independent and final within league rules.
- However, the Premier League could seek judicial review in UK courts if they believe the process was flawed (rare and difficult to succeed)
- City may pursue damages or legal costs against the Premier League for reputational harm and expenses.
- This could lead to civil litigation, but that’s separate from the sporting case.
- If City win outright, the sporting case ends immediately.
- Any civil claims could take 1–2 years, but they won’t affect league standings or future participation.
Here’s the timeline comparison for both scenarios:
View attachment 175098
SO according to this little diagram, looks like we'll not be finally rid of this until end of 2027 (if we win) or into 2029 (if we don't)!!!!! FFS
Mostly wrongSo I went on to ask to ask about the appeal process and how long it could extend this case.
Naturally even Copilot assumed the PL would win (FFS)...
1. Initial Verdict
2. Right to Appeal
- The independent commission delivers its ruling on the 115 charges.
- If Manchester City are found guilty, sanctions could include fines, points deductions, or even expulsion from the league.
3. Potential Escalation
- Manchester City can appeal the decision to an independent appeal board appointed by the Premier League.
- This board is separate from the original commission and reviews the case from scratch, considering evidence and arguments again.
4. Timeline Impact
- If City lose the appeal, they can take the matter to UK courts under arbitration law.
- In extreme cases, they could escalate to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), especially if UEFA-related implications arise.
Overall Estimate
- Appeal board stage: Could take 6–12 months after the initial verdict.
- Court challenges: Add another 12–18 months, depending on complexity.
- CAS involvement: Adds 6–12 months more if pursued.
So naturally I then asked "what about if manchester city win?"
- If the verdict comes in early 2026, the full process (including appeals) could push the final resolution into 2027 or beyond.
If Manchester City win the case (i.e., all or most charges are dismissed), here’s what happens:
(here's the interesting bit...)
- The independent commission clears City of wrongdoing.
- No sanctions (points deduction, fines, or expulsion) are applied.
- The Premier League bears the reputational hit for a lengthy and costly investigation.
- The Premier League cannot appeal to overturn the verdict because the commission is independent and final within league rules.
- However, the Premier League could seek judicial review in UK courts if they believe the process was flawed (rare and difficult to succeed)
- City may pursue damages or legal costs against the Premier League for reputational harm and expenses.
- This could lead to civil litigation, but that’s separate from the sporting case.
- If City win outright, the sporting case ends immediately.
- Any civil claims could take 1–2 years, but they won’t affect league standings or future participation.
Here’s the timeline comparison for both scenarios:
View attachment 175098
SO according to this little diagram, looks like we'll not be finally rid of this until end of 2027 (if we win) or into 2029 (if we don't)!!!!! FFS
cheers Stefan!It is wrong in a number of respects. In fact, most of it is wrong. Ignore.
I think even some of the anti-City journo's are bored now. This break and the Liverpool match was peak territory to do another all out attack on the club but bar the odd murmur it's been so quiet even by their low standardsInternational break nearly over.
So on it goes
AI producing made-up rubbish? I don't believe it!It is wrong in a number of respects. In fact, most of it is wrong. Ignore.
Not as quiet as the PROVEN Chelsea cheats!I think even some of the anti-City journo's are bored now. This break and the Liverpool match was peak territory to do another all out attack on the club but bar the odd murmur it's been so quiet even by their low standards
If they do give an earlier result can we accuse them of not being thorough enough and skimping their task?CoPilot this morning says...
The verdict on Manchester City’s 115 Premier League charges has been repeatedly delayed. Here’s the latest:
Why the delay?
- The independent commission hearing concluded in December 2024, but no decision has been announced yet.
- Multiple reports suggest the Premier League initially hoped for a ruling in spring or summer 2025, then during the October international break (4–18 October). However, that window passed without an outcome.
- As of mid-November 2025, insiders say the decision is still pending, partly due to internal Premier League politics (e.g., debate over chair Alison Brittain’s future) and the complexity of the case. There is no confirmed date, and some sources warn it could drag into 2026, especially if appeals follow. [onefootball.com], [manchester...news.co.uk], [express.co.uk]
- The case involves alleged breaches from 2009–2018, including inaccurate financial reporting and non-cooperation.
- Legal processes are slow, and the Premier League has no control over the independent panel’s timeline.
- Any verdict will likely trigger appeals, meaning the saga could continue well beyond the initial ruling. [sportbible.com], [si.com]
Bottom line: There is no official announcement date, but the earliest realistic expectation now seems to be sometime in 2026, unless the commission surprises everyone with a decision soon.
Sorry chaps...
I much preferred the other Brian, Brian the snail from Magic Roundabout fame.Out of interest just been looking at your recent post history.
You are one miserable, glass half empty, old curmudgeon. You seem to get off on negativity.
It's funny how those rules on acting with good faith towards other clubs never got used when Liverpool hacked our Scout7 database, or when Klopp, Henry and others made extremely disrespectful comments about our finances. Or when a number of them signed a letter on Arsenal-headed notepaper requesting our suspension from UEFA competitions be upheld quickly.We have all read the opinions of other fans if found guilty,relegation,points reduction,fines etc.But on the other hand what happens to the clubs who pushed for the 115-130 charges,do they just walk away,what are their punishments forget the whip round to pay off our lawyers fee.What about the PL rules regarding the respect of other clubs,.The Red Cartel plus Spurs,what is their punishments for pushing this case for years,,if we were found guilty the payoff to other clubs will be enormous,but if innocent can we sue all the clubs who agreed to go for City,Comments.
oh well, at least copilot’s narrowed it down to the right year, eh?cheers Stefan!
I thought it was us who were delaying it?I wonder if the timescale that this case is providing could have been predicted?
All legal opinion at least on this Forum has up to now suggested it would take more time because of its complexity.
Is it possible that complexity could have been predicted prior to allegation ie deliberately complicated simply to delay or prolong it's outcome by the PL.
If so is that bad faith?
The thing I don’t understand is why the parties have apparently not been given broad timescales. The PL is paying for the panel and will have to budget for the costs over several years. There must have been advance discussions to agree likely milestones in the contract. That said given Masters’ inexperience and stupidity perhaps nothing was put in place. Perhaps the PL just signed off a blank cheque without assessing the risk.I wonder if the timescale that this case is providing could have been predicted?
All legal opinion at least on this Forum has up to now suggested it would take more time because of its complexity.
Is it possible that complexity could have been predicted prior to allegation ie deliberately complicated simply to delay or prolong it's outcome by the PL.
If so is that bad faith?