It seems unlikely to me, simply on the grounds that to move onto the 'punishment' phase they'd need to have told us which allegations had been proven, otherwise, how can we provide mitigation?Some people have suggested that they may have moved onto 'part 2' and would publish both the liability outcome, and suggested penalty simultaneously, but later. No idea how feasible or not that is. I don't fond it illogical, but I don’t quite believe it. On nothing more than gut alone.
There is a clear suggestion that City should have acted differently at the outset of proceedings. What they should have done differently and how that would have affected the timescale is my question. Listen to Stefan's first answer on here at around 4'50 referring to the parameters as an example.
come on they sign for city signing on fee and good wages might win something but it goes pear shaped sign for another top team signing on fee good wages chance to win something their little down side plus past history city dont hang on to players that want outWhilst the formal verdict is not in, how have City persuaded so many players to sign contracts/ extensions?
If you were Guehi, and you had 4-5 clubs chasing your signature, why choose City if we potentially have a relegation sentence hanging over their heads? City must have a convincing way of addressing such fears.
I think the consensus among the bewigged is that it is surprisingly slow in coming - i.e. the delay is unjustified.Yes, but who exactly says it is late?
Not Lord P, and if it was late he'd be saying so, wouldn't he?
I stand by and will always stand by my claim that there is no delay, jc.
Who are these people nicely positioned to make the most of Trumps stupidity?Khaldoon clearly knows that Trump is a stupid and arrogant ****, but is determined to milk the US for as much as possible.
The " Board Of Peace" is an absolutely perverse oxymoron when considering the position that Trump holds within the organisation.
An egotist and 100% physcopath who is so focussed on massaging his own ego that he surroundeds by yes men/women as deranged and pathetic as himself.
The stupidity of this shitshow cannot be understated, but there is a serious undercurrent which should not be overlooked.
Trump believes that he is so fucking clever, but there are many more who are nicely positioned to make the most of Donald's ego and stupidity, and that is a very satisfying thought.
And the moronic element is so appropriate when watching the ramblings of a total uber **** who reduces the status of the post of the President of the US into a shameful and unstatesmanlike era never witnessed before.
Surely that should be liability outcome and agreed compensation to City simultaneously?Some people have suggested that they may have moved onto 'part 2' and would publish both the liability outcome, and suggested penalty simultaneously, but later. No idea how feasible or not that is. I don't fond it illogical, but I don’t quite believe it. On nothing more than gut alone.
Have you any proof at all about this bewigged consensus?I think the consensus among the bewigged is that it is surprisingly slow in coming - i.e. the delay is unjustified.
This is why i love you :)I was thinking about standing by my claim but on balance it's better to be standing about thinking ;-)
It seems unlikely to me, simply on the grounds that to move onto the 'punishment' phase they'd need to have told us which allegations had been proven, otherwise, how can we provide mitigation?
Surely that should be liability outcome and agreed compensation to City simultaneously?
And no, I don't believe either scenario myself, it just is what it is.
Although i can't be arsed to research/find it, i definitely recall, a fair few months ago, at least one wanker from on high at a premier league club moaning, out of the blue, about how long it was taking and that in future such matters of timescale should be addressed in advance, or summat like that.Who knows? Maybe the PL tried to impose timing on the panel and that is exactly what the club said, and did .... (yes, I know I shouldn't have ....)
Well all the legally qualified posters on here anyway - not sure they all have wigs - are without exception highly critical of the excessive length time that has already elapsed between the completion of the hearing and the publication of the panel ruling.Have you any proof at all about this bewigged consensus?
The club gets the reasons either way. The only question is publication. I think it is unlikely they wait until the end but it is theoretically possible and the wording of announcements and the rules is not precise on the point.It seems unlikely to me, simply on the grounds that to move onto the 'punishment' phase they'd need to have told us which allegations had been proven, otherwise, how can we provide mitigation?
The parties sat before them so they know. But the identities are a closely held secret. Amazing it has not come out.Am i correct in thinking that no one here knows who the 3 man panel is ? Not even Stefan.
Lord Pannick and those in the 10-12 weeks obviously do, but we don't?
The parties sat before them so they know. But the identities are a closely held secret. Amazing it has not come out.
Who are these people nicely positioned to make the most of Trumps stupidity?
Why would the club want delays unless they actually did something wrongIf I was City, and the PL came to me in these circumstances and said, yes we know we all signed up to this procedure but we want to tell the panel to have it all settled by the summer, is that OK? I would have told them to fuck off and, when they get there, to fuck off again and, if they did try it, we would take them to arbitration and the high court if necessary and lose another two years. I don't get the impression that the club are in much mood for compromise on this whole thing unless its on favourable terms.
Who knows? Maybe the PL tried to impose timing on the panel and that is exactly what the club said, and did .... (yes, I know I shouldn't have ....)
I'm probably misunderstanding what you're saying here, so apologies in advance, but wouldn't they need to tell us their decision before we move to the sanctions stage? Everyone seems to be adamant that they haven't heard anything yet though, so how could they have moved to the next stage?The club gets the reasons either way. The only question is publication. I think it is unlikely they wait until the end but it is theoretically possible and the wording of announcements and the rules is not precise on the point.
We also wouldn't want a 'rushed' decision if the proposed timescale was perceived as too short thoughWhy would the club want delays unless they actually did something wrong
; )Fat fucker looks like he's been nibbling dried chamomile flowers or summat :)
Don't tell anyone though, eh.
Ferguson gill NevilleAm i correct in thinking that no one here knows who the 3 man panel is ? Not even Stefan.
Lord Pannick and those in the 10-12 weeks obviously do, but we don't?