Correct, but actually the blame lies with Alisson. If he'd been back in his own half after the corner, instead of thinking he was Messi, that situation would never have occurred.They were two separate incidents.
It was the correct decision. The blame lies with the cheating scouse ****.
watched the game in a bar in Amsterdam yesterday, freekick, @Kippax Street 1880 says our Donu will save it easy.
Boom goal, we have a flight to catch, so we leave 10 mins earlier than planned.
On the train to schipol airport, and see all the madness happening!
Was Eric Bana in Platoon?When I see little Mo dance into the area during a game, I am always reminded of that great promo picture for the film Platoon, with Eric Bana falling to his kness and his arms in the air. (as above)
He was one of our best players, covering nearly as much ground as Bernado, winning tackles, ghosting past people and generally causing problems. He's better in midfield than at full back and from what I've seen is looming like a mainstay of our midfield for years to come.Not sure what game you was watching he was bypassed all game especially when Salah was fouled.
I might of missed this already, but did Haaland not get a second yellow for the foul, as it goes back to the first offence? Even though it was Haalands foul that took it back…It was the right decision ...... he can't go allowing goals to stand where two blatant fouls have been committed in the build up, and before the ball had crossed the line .... and it was right to penalise the Liverpool player for his deliberate intention of trying to prevent Haaland scoring in the first place.
They really do hate Bernardo.lol.
Nope. It was a perfectly weighted push kick aimed at rolling the ball into an empty net.he did not look to pass.his first thought is to score.thats in his nature it was brilliant.so well measured.I'm fairly certain that Cherki passed the ball into space for Haaland or perhaps O'Reilly (if he saw him) to tap in. If he'd been going for goal himself he'd have put more of his foot through the ball.
That’s football!
No, presumably because if the game is stopped at the point of the first foul and a free kick and red card is given at that point, the second foul (by Haaland) doesn't occur.I might of missed this already, but did Haaland not get a second yellow for the foul, as it goes back to the first offence? Even though it was Haalands foul that took it back…
Nope. It was a perfectly weighted push kick aimed at rolling the ball into an empty net.he did not look to pass.his first thought is to score.thats in his nature it was brilliant.so well measured.
Such quick thinking .
What a Player.no wonder Foden was buzzing on the sidelines,he knows what Cherki meant to do ..and did.
The shot was just perfect.
If your playing a game of football,and you know the oppenents keeper is behind you,with an empty goal,you are not looking to pass to anyone,the weight on the ball was too much for any of the 3 chasing players ..because it was a shot.
Classic Push kick.sidefoot .accurate.
But it was Haalands foul that took it back, as up to that point it was advantage CityNo, presumably because if the game is stopped at the point of the first foul and a free kick and red card is given at that point, the second foul (by Haaland) doesn't occur.
Not only that, but the Liverpool player only gets into that position because he fouled Haaland in the first place.
Whole thing was a farce, if he doesn't foul Haaland, Haaland scores, but either way the ball ends up in the back of the net. That one goal difference could be important at the end of the season.
Last time I saw us win at Anfield..under Keegan..I went wild.our lot..Debs Val JK Sarah Kenny and Dave Cotton ...many more etc etc .....just went on the biggest piss up back to lime street..we drank and danced in every bar on Matthew street,I was dancing next to Val,to the song "Valarie" but I put so much into my dancing I pulled a muscle in my thigh,lol had to be carried off the dancefloor by the lads in agony..upstairs to the gents toilets....pissed out me head.I slept well but woke up at 5.30 still buzzing. We won at Anfield. We beat the dippers in their own home. We won at Anfield.
Absolutely agree. First of all, if Haaland isn't fouled he scores. He is, but the ball ends up in the back of the net without either player ever touching it anyway so either way it's a goal. If you've played advantage then surely it has to play out?Then the goal should stand.
To me the goal either stands, as the advantage played was fulfilled, and the tussle is part of an off the ball action.
OR, the goal is disallowed because Haaland fouls Szobozlai, squandering the advantage played.
What they did makes no sense to me, because they are refereeing 3 consequential events by going back to the first.
Very much like Dzeko when he got the equaliser against QPR.