gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
I take it you’ve never been to DC-10 on a Monday afternoon?Shit scared. For the first time in his life he is not in the royal bubble. The real world scares him to death.
I take it you’ve never been to DC-10 on a Monday afternoon?Shit scared. For the first time in his life he is not in the royal bubble. The real world scares him to death.
Plus the hundred plus million the tax payer give them annuallyI expect most wealthy people’s fortune started with one crime or another. The Royal family are far from the exception.
It’s done as an institution, but I’d say it’s bought more pluses than minuses in the last couple of hundred years.Plus the hundred plus million the tax payer give them annually
At that point, I’d say it looked pretty done. It went, came back, but that doesn’t mean it can’t go again. And maybe never come back. Why not? How can you say with any certainty that won’t happen?
Obviously we can't but after over 2000 years the odds are in its favour - gets my vote a over a President Nigel anyway.At that point, I’d say it looked pretty done. It went, came back, but that doesn’t mean it can’t go again. And maybe never come back. Why not? How can you say with any certainty that won’t happen?
It’s certainly done in its present form, but conversely anyone thinking, even if it’s abolished, the likes of Kate and William will simply fade into obscurity is absolutely wrong imo.Obviously we can't but after over 2000 years the odds are in its favour - gets my vote an over a President Nigel anyway.
Probably put a better crunch in than Reijnders ever will.
Not done at all, the monarchy will continue to slowly evolve and blend into civilization as lately introduced. It embodies the rights of possession and succession which anyone who has ever owned anything and wishes to pass it to their chosen heirs will probably support.It’s certainly done in its present form, but conversely anyone thinking, even if it’s abolished, the likes of Kate and William will simply fade into obscurity is absolutely wrong imo.
Forgive my probable daftness and annoyingness but I haven’t followed this story at all.He's toast. Enough people want him jailed to carry it over the line. And he'll deserve it so much, he has behaved like someone who expects it will all just go away... when really he should have done a runner years ago if that's at all possible for a royal.
But It's clear all these rich twats have their dirty fingers in all sorts of pies, I think they hope Andrew will satiate people's (and the press) desire for justice.
They are wealthy enough to no longer need taxpayer money. That money could go to better useIt’s done as an institution, but I’d say it’s bought more pluses than minuses in the last couple of hundred years.
And not remotely arsed about £100 million here and there when you’re debating the structure of the British state. It’s a nugatory consideration.
they are still working on it but everyone agrees he's guilty whatever it isForgive my probable daftness and annoyingness but I haven’t followed this story at all.
What exactly has he done?
Have you noticed how wealthy men of influence when questioned about Epstein have a first response of " I didn't/hardly knew him, I never met him (when it comes out they did) or I knew him but had no idea what he was doing"?
He may be able to raise a sustainable defence, but it’s difficult to see where he has to go when you look at those emails. You simply cannot have a public official sending shit like that to anyone, never mind a convicted nonce.they are still working on it but everyone agrees he's guilty whatever it is
but were they sent in his role as a 'public officer' or as a private individual? Rozenberg on SKY maintained it is a vague and difficult to define offence.He may be able to raise a sustainable defence, but it’s difficult to see where he has to go when you look at those emails. You simply cannot have a public official sending shit like that to anyone, never mind a convicted nonce.