US & Israel attack Iran

As was I, you called me naive.

Are you willing to answer the question on Oman? Without having a huge insight into those negotations, surely if they were making progress that was worth exploring as an alternative to war.
Same as always; people chat whilst people die, in the end it comes to nothing.

Do you think the Ayatollah would agree to stop ruling with an iron fist as a result of those negotiations? They weren't even about the protestors situation or the subjugation of Iranian Women.
 
Not really.

When tens of thousands of Persians were being killed in January because they’d simply had enough and started an uprise, you only have to see this forum and the Iran threads, never mind the wider society, where there were no more than a dozen pages and nobody seemed to care much. The Gaza thread would get a dozen pages on days where nothing happened.

America take out the Ayatollah and all of any sudden we’re approaching 100 pages in a handful of days.

Its just not true to say that people didnt care much.

I would say there was pretty much universal agreement that the killing of protesters was appalling. Nor read through the whole thread, but I havent seen one post in favour of rhe regime.

We (Britain) are now in the middle of a war. There are people who agree with it, and those that dont. Theres back and forth between the two and there is breaking news by the hour.

Is it really a shock that this thread is busy?
 
Its just not true to say that people didnt care much.

I would say there was pretty much universal agreement that the killing of protesters was appalling. Nor read through the whole thread, but I havent seen one post in favour of rhe regime.

We (Britain) are now in the middle of a war. There are people who agree with it, and those that dont. Theres back and forth between the two and there is breaking news by the hour.

Is it really a shock that this thread is busy
Britain is not involved in this war. We didn't take part in the strikes and are only allowing US use of our bases because we don't have the capacity to defend them from Iranian missiles due to underfunding for decades.

Our Government has already stated we are not a part of this.
 
Same as always; people chat whilst people die, in the end it comes to nothing.

Do you think the Ayatollah would agree to stop ruling with an iron fist as a result of those negotiations? They weren't even about the protestors situation or the subjugation of Iranian Women.

I think a lot could be achieved through negotation. Lifting sanctions, economic support, regional security all tools thay could be used to initiate change.

By all accounts Oman was making progress.

From what I understand, much of the protests were related to the financial situation in Iran, something that (rightly or wrongly - I dont have a clear view on that) the international community has had an impact on.
 
Britain is not involved in this war. We didn't take part in the strikes and are only allowing US use of our bases because we don't have the capacity to defend them from Iranian missiles due to underfunding for decades.

Our Government has already stated we are not a part of this.
We are part of it.
 
I think a lot could be achieved through negotation. Lifting sanctions, economic support, regional security all tools thay could be used to initiate change.

By all accounts Oman was making progress.

From what I understand, much of the protests were related to the financial situation in Iran, something that (rightly or wrongly - I dont have a clear view on that) the international community has had an impact on.
That's how it began, yes, until the regime starting shooting people for protesting, then it became something larger.
 
We are part of it.
Government says 'no', you say 'yes'. Odd behaviour.
How are we part of the war? We aren't firing missiles into Iran last time I heard.
Only shooting down drones and missiles that have UK interests as their intended target.

You know, to stop people from being killed by them? We're more involved in a war with Russia by that reasoning; training Ukrainian soldiers on UK soil, giving them weapons and equipment, assisting in battle direction. (All of which i'm in favour of)
 
Its just not true to say that people didnt care much.

I would say there was pretty much universal agreement that the killing of protesters was appalling. Nor read through the whole thread, but I havent seen one post in favour of rhe regime.

We (Britain) are now in the middle of a war. There are people who agree with it, and those that dont. Theres back and forth between the two and there is breaking news by the hour.

Is it really a shock that this thread is busy?
It similar to the Venezuela situation. I was walking past the Quaker building in Town last Summer and saw around 30 people at a peaceful protest waving Venezuela flags. I got chatting to them - they were very nice and calm people, weren’t calling anyone fascists or threatening them for asking them questions - and asked what they were demonstrating about and they explained the situation in their country with 7 million people being displaced with no access to shelter, healthcare or food and the the tens of thousands of indiscriminate executions that have happened.

Nobody here has ever seemed to give a shit about it. Yet, when the it evil fucker of a leader there was deposed, everyone here was up in arms and even the British media portrayed Venezuelans who were out celebrating in London and Manchester as demonstrators against the USA for their actions.

Selective outrage is very real here.
 
Regarding Douglas Macgregor
He's an American far-right grifter and close friends with Tucker Carlson, and is basically a Russian asset. He uses his past titles to command respect, but these days he’s used to push Russian interests, which means lying to defend his allies and attack his enemies. Over the past few years he’s spent his time spreading every possible conspiracy about Ukraine, from Zelensky supposedly buying dozens of mansions with foreign money, to claims about a Nazi regime, a pro-LGBT regime, biolabs making biological weapons, basically whatever story gives different audiences a reason to hate Ukraine. He does the same with Israel, the US, Europe, and any country that stands in the way of Russian interests.

I’m bringing this up because he has less credibility on any topic than some random person on X.
Fair enough mate, I was unaware of that I admit. It popped up on my feed and found his take interesting based on his past advisory role
 
It similar to the Venezuela situation. I was walking past the Quaker building in Town last Summer and saw around 30 people at a peaceful protest waving Venezuela flags. I got chatting to them - they were very nice and calm people, weren’t calling anyone fascists or threatening them for asking them questions - and asked what they were demonstrating about and they explained the situation in their country with 7 million people being displaced with no access to shelter, healthcare or food and the the tens of thousands of indiscriminate executions that have happened.

Nobody here has ever seemed to give a shit about it. Yet, when the it evil fucker of a leader there was deposed, everyone here was up in arms and even the British media portrayed Venezuelans who were out celebrating in London and Manchester as demonstrators against the USA for their actions.

Selective outrage is very real here.
Then it dies down and they move on to the next outrage.

How are things in Venezuela, just out of interest? That's not me being snarky, genuinely interested in how things have been over there since.
 
Nobody here has ever seemed to give a shit about it. Yet, when the it evil fucker of a leader there was deposed, everyone here was up in arms and even the British media portrayed Venezuelans who were out celebrating in London and Manchester as demonstrators against the USA for their actions.

Selective outrage is very real here.

From what I saw (from a variety of sources), there was next to no-one supporting Maduro. Most were glad he was gone.

There was criticism of the legality (or otherwise) of a country going into another country but the two positions arent incompatible.

Interesting though that with Maduro gone, the regime in Venezuela remains largely unchanged.

Thats what people fear in Iran. Killings, destruction and all for nothing.
 
But i'm hearing from others that the 'International Community' should have taken charge of the situation.

Are you in agreement that they do nothing when it matters and we should look at this as a golden opportunity for the Iranian people, with our continued support of course, to not allow the zealots and despots of that nation reclaim power? If so, i'm all for that!
It is an opportunity, but the opposition in Iran is disjointed, only the UN and it's peacekeeprs being involved can help.

I do think this thread is throwing up a few different discussions and some are getting mixed up in comments and replies.

The Ianain people and a better future in a free and prosperous religiously amd socially tolerent nation, think we all want that.

America and Israel personal power plays which give no. regard to killing civillians be it Iran, Lebanon or the wider area, they are war mongering cunts and no denial.

How weak the international community and law is in the present era, might as well not exist.
 
From what I saw (from a variety of sources), there was next to no-one supporting Maduro. Most were glad he was gone.

There was criticism of the legality (or otherwise) of a country going into another country but the two positions arent incompatible.

Interesting though that with Maduro gone, the regime in Venezuela remains largely unchanged.

Thats what people fear in Iran. Killings, destruction and all for nothing.
Apply that same logic (and hope) to this situation in Iran.

That's where a lot of us are at. No violence, but the regime is gone and the Iranians can build a better future for themselves.
 
Apply that same logic (and hope) to this situation in Iran.

That's where a lot of us are at.
I dont think the positions are hugely different.

Most are glad that the Ayatollah has gone.

Many are concerned that America and Israel are acting contrary to international law.

All should be hopeful that there is a plan in place for what happens next.

Many of us are concerned that there isnt.
 
It is an opportunity, but the opposition in Iran is disjointed, only the UN and it's peacekeeprs being involved can help.

I do think this thread is throwing up a few different discussions and some are getting mixed up in comments and replies.

The Ianain people and a better future in a free and prosperous religiously amd socially tolerent nation, think we all want that.

America and Israel personal power plays which give no. regard to killing civillians be it Iran, Lebanon or the wider area, they are war mongering cunts and no denial.

How weak the international community and law is in the present era, might as well not exist.
Basically. When Russia is allowed to do what it wants, yet the world imposes sanctions whilst buying it's oil and gas I tend to have little faith in the imposing of 'International Law'.

It gets bounded about like some buzzword. Fact is nobody really adheres to it. It's a nice fuzzy idea but when you have a law like that, who enforces it?
 
It similar to the Venezuela situation. I was walking past the Quaker building in Town last Summer and saw around 30 people at a peaceful protest waving Venezuela flags. I got chatting to them - they were very nice and calm people, weren’t calling anyone fascists or threatening them for asking them questions - and asked what they were demonstrating about and they explained the situation in their country with 7 million people being displaced with no access to shelter, healthcare or food and the the tens of thousands of indiscriminate executions that have happened.

Nobody here has ever seemed to give a shit about it. Yet, when the it evil fucker of a leader there was deposed, everyone here was up in arms and even the British media portrayed Venezuelans who were out celebrating in London and Manchester as demonstrators against the USA for their actions.
You're saying that people are self serving hypocrites, with morals that move depending on where their political advantage is? It's amazing how quickly people turn away from the repressed when the status quo suits them isn't it. All of a sudden it's better for the world to do nothing, let's leave the repressed to their repression.
 
Apply that same logic (and hope) to this situation in Iran.

That's where a lot of us are at. No violence, but the regime is gone and the Iranians can build a better future for themselves.

The problem with this theory is 3 fold.

(1) We don't know how many Iranian civilians have died or will die from US and Israeli attacks.
(2) We don't know that the Islamic Republic regime will be weakened to the point where it can be overthrown from within.
(3) Now it's clear that Israel is driving all of this, it's not clear that a free democratic Iran will even be allowed to form or flourish. The thing that suits Netenyahu most is a weakened, Western approved Ayatollah who keeps his violence in-house. The Saudi's and UAE, who have spent tens of billions bribing/cosying up to Trump are also not interested in the country with the 4th biggest oil deposits becoming a rich, flourishing democracy in the region.


Nothing we have seen from the US or Israel suggests that they are genuinely interested in creating or supporting a democratic revolution in Iran.


It's a nice idea that this results in a free democratic Iran opening up to the world, I really hope it happens but we have to accept the chances of it ending this way are incredibly remote and the most likely outcome is tens of thousands of dead Iranian civilians, a different, even more hardline Ayatollah who cracks down even harder to reestablish control/power domestically and things just reset for a few years.
 
Last edited:

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top