Only place I’ve seen it are posters in here,nowhere else. Well Simon Jordan, but he’s a dick.He probably was tapped up and we’ll deal with that if the PL charge us with it,but doesn’t mean he’s still contracted to them.I don't know what the Chelsea position is, just that it keeps coming up. If they've sacked him and he's no longer employed by them in any way I don't see how what he does now has anything to do with them.
If they thought City had tapped him up then surely that should have been dealt with at the time?
I think he broke his contract and he cannot be employed until he reaches a settlement with them.I don't know what the Chelsea position is, just that it keeps coming up. If they've sacked him and he's no longer employed by them in any way I don't see how what he does now has anything to do with them.
If they thought City had tapped him up then surely that should have been dealt with at the time?
Can AI do it?
He quit them months ago, so he isn't "employed by another club".It's most likely the Chelsea issue that is preventing any announcement, you can't make an announcement if he's officially still employed by another club.
They didn't sack him, he left them because they wouldn't do things he wanted them to do.If they've sacked him and he's no longer employed by them in any way I don't see how what he does now has anything to do with them.
Thought it was in his contract that he had to tell them if he was talking to anyone else. He informed them, they fired him.I think he broke his contract and he cannot be employed until he reaches a settlement with them.
It is rumoured that we may stump up the money that Maresca owes Chelsea
Artificial Intelilol.Shearer?
I don't think you can say "totally wrong" on an opinion. But I guess you think you can.Totally wrong. You still have to get to the final and do what you have to do to gain those trophies. If he wasn't any good they likely wouldn't have got that far. If they weren't a great side then it's an even bigger achievement.
Nobody is suggesting they're major trophies, but it's about having a winning mentality, that's the point that everybody is missing.
As for Leicester they are a big club compared to many (they were big enough to win the Premier League title), and they were in total disarray when he took over. He cleared out the deadwood and many thought he had made a mistake but he got them promoted with 97 points.
Not seen that before, but I stick with what I said.The report below cites compensation talks...
- Compensation talks with Chelsea likely to be reason behind delay in formal announcement
https://cityxtra.co.uk/47496/reveal...icially-announced-as-manchester-city-manager/
It seems a likely explanation unless someone else has a better explanation.
As you suggest Maresca and Chelsea's board fell out and the relationship between broke down after it was reported that Maresca advised the Chelsea board that City had contacted his representatives. There are reporters with City and Chelsea connections claiming that this is still an issue.They didn't sack him, he left them because they wouldn't do things he wanted them to do.
"CityXtra" are not "reporters", they are a news aggregate site.There are reporters with City and Chelsea connections claiming that this is still an issue.
I am aware of that. The report they reference is behind a pay wall."CityXtra" are not "reporters", they are a news aggregate site.
As you suggest Maresca and Chelsea's board fell out and the relationship between broke down after it was reported that Maresca advised the Chelsea board that City had contacted his representatives. There are reporters with City and Chelsea connections claiming that this is still an issue.
They 'parted ways'. That was the term used in the reports. So neither sacked nor fired, mutual agreement.
That's just old age mate.i am beginning to smell bedwetting on this thread.
The link in the story says he "quit".They 'parted ways'. That was the term used in the reports. So neither sacked nor fired, mutual agreement.
The key question is what City said. If they just asked whether the fallout meant Maresca might be on the market in the forseeable future then it is in no way tapping up.As you suggest Maresca and Chelsea's board fell out and the relationship between broke down after it was reported that Maresca advised the Chelsea board that City had contacted his representatives. There are reporters with City and Chelsea connections claiming that this is still an issue.
He also finished 4th with that Chelsea teamThat chelsea team wasn't great. I know people keep thinking that winning a summer friendly cup and the conference league of europe against ajkhyenn_athens and baraggyecth of riga is success - but it really isn't. It doesn't mean he isn't good, but please - can we stop with the idea that those two cups meant anything at all. Also Leicester is not, and never will be, a big club.