City & FFP | 2020/21 Accounts released | Revenues of £569.8m, £2.4m profit (p 2395)

Don't worry on that score mate. Our owners are too strong. The lily livered, weak bureaucrats at FIFA and UEFA have discovered that. And they have to accept the tide.

Sorry but I do not see any evidence of that. We got fucked over by UEFA 12 months ago and our owners didn't anything. Now they are fucking us over again, harder and without lube. I do hope our owners have a plan and I almost wish that they have already been on the phone to the Qatari owners of PSG to come up with a joint plan to fight this. This latest change in the FFP just proves the intent to stop us so blatently, I mean they are not even trying to hide it anymore!
 
Seriously though, if Inter are indeed one of the clubs that were campaigning for a relaxation in the regs then you have to ask what these new proposals do to benefit them given that they already been sanctioned under the old rules and therefore under the same restrictions as all other clubs that have been punished.

My understanding is that Inter's settlement runs until 2019. In theory they wouldn't be able to apply for accelerated owner investment under the new regs until 2022. UEFA make the rules up as they go along. I think that they are trying to give as many of the old G14 as possible one last leg up this Summer before the whole system is declared illegal.
 
We are obviously going to spend big this summer so that should put our minds at rest as to the short term future on the pitch, you can only see our turnover going north of £400m very very soon. What is exciting and no doubt we will find out in the coming months are the new sponsorship deals or renegotiation of existing sponsorship deals namely Etihad and Nike.

We havent anything to worry about, we will have the biggest turnover in the PL within the next 3 seasons.

FFP is a thing of the past for City
 
Seriously thinking of giving football a swerve if it happens again this summer! Not gonna pay to watch a corrupt sport that doesn't allow teams to challenge elite!
 
The MEN article is more than disappointing. I think we are most definitely the sole target of FFP.
 
This thread has looked at FFP and MCFC and there has always been the fact that FFP1 was likely to protect us from new owners copying our model. Most argued for simple abolition of FFP dismissing the benefit it would give us as not ethical (assuming we actually need that advantage).

FFP2 appears to have selective relaxation of the rules so most now seem to have shifted opinion to see this as a negative for City. City are no worse off with FFP2 than with FFP1 so why are we feeling victimised ?

Frankly our owners must be delighted that their business plan has been proven to succeed whereas the old established model for even G14 clubs can fail. ADUG will carry on regardless working towards progress rather than worrying about any version of FFP that does not affect the financial success of its own vision.
 
We underestimated them last season and got stung. They change the rules to suit themselves at the end of the day and we will do what they say, ou know we will because we want to participate in the champions league
 
We underestimated them last season and got stung. They change the rules to suit themselves at the end of the day and we will do what they say, ou know we will because we want to participate in the champions league

Doesn't change the fact that Brennan and co are complete KFAs compared to Khaldoon and you'd be better served putting your trust in him.
 
FFP2 appears to have selective relaxation of the rules so most now seem to have shifted opinion to see this as a negative for City. City are no worse off with FFP2 than with FFP1 so why are we feeling victimised ?

Materially FFP2 or complete abolition may or may not worry us, given previous club statements about achieving self sufficiency.

Where people feel indignant is the discriminatory nature of FFP2, in particular the restrictions 3 years after the Settlement has expired.
It's a bit like being given a harsh sentence for a crime that isn't a crime, seeing the courts subsequently rule that it's not a crime,
being forced to serve the full sentence anyway and then being placed on parole after serving the full sentence for the non crime.
Not quite fair is it?
 
Our old friend Tony Attwood and his sidekick Walter Broeckx are still peddling the ludicrous idea that the City Football Group model is purely and simply a way of fudging FFP. Anyway, I couldn't resist making this comment:

Walter, I thought you’d might have been switched on enough to know that that last comment was tongue in cheek. Anyway, the point I’m making is that City aren’t buying stakes in clubs situated in some of the world’s biggest cities just to get round FFP but if you and Tony want to believe that then by all means do. I said it on here some months back but what City are doing is effectively going for world domination and you can bookmark that comment in 5 years time when we’re posting the biggest turnover in world football and annual profits of £100 million-plus
1f609.png


http://untold-arsenal.com/archives/44461
 
Doesn't change the fact that Brennan and co are complete KFAs compared to Khaldoon and you'd be better served putting your trust in him.
Blind faith and optimism I do not do. I do love our chairman but this club is swimming against the tide with regards to FFP. Just when you think you have succeeded they pull the rug out from under us once again.
 
This thread has looked at FFP and MCFC and there has always been the fact that FFP1 was likely to protect us from new owners copying our model. Most argued for simple abolition of FFP dismissing the benefit it would give us as not ethical (assuming we actually need that advantage).

FFP2 appears to have selective relaxation of the rules so most now seem to have shifted opinion to see this as a negative for City. City are no worse off with FFP2 than with FFP1 so why are we feeling victimised ?

Frankly our owners must be delighted that their business plan has been proven to succeed whereas the old established model for even G14 clubs can fail. ADUG will carry on regardless working towards progress rather than worrying about any version of FFP that does not affect the financial success of its own vision.
To a degree, but I think this is an over simplistic and optimistic representation of our situation. A wise man once told the one thing worse than death is revenge as death is certain but with revenge you don't know when or where it will happen only that at some point it will, and that is no way for a man to live.

All Manchester City want to do is go about our business as all other football clubs in history have been allowed to but without having to look over our shoulder keeping one eye on the G14 and the other on where we're going. I'd rather a situation whereby our whole concentration was on our way forward and not having to waste time, effort and resources legislating for whatever the corrupt bastards want to throw at us next.

That's the perfect world view, but the reality is we complied last year, but then the G14/UEFA moved the goal posts and fucked us over. I'm absolutely 100% positive that if it were not for 'What are the G14/UEFA going to come with next' that our reported targets of Sterling, KDB, Pogba etc would already be in the bag.

Whether we're going to be effected by FFP v1 or FFP 2.0 going forward or not, I think it is still having a major effect on us even if it is just Manchester City having to hold back our recruitment plans this summer until we're sure of the G14's next move. Either way, they still have a hold on us. Admittedly as time goes by I believe this hold will evaporate away like a dog's piss puddle on a hot summers day, but as it stands, I think it naive to think we can relax & just get on with business as usual and not make keeping a firm glare on what the G14/UEFA have planned for us next a major priority.

If anything illustrates this perfectly, FFP 2.0 is a case in point.....................
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top