bluemonkey71
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 7,551
How could that up front cost be paid outside of the club? Surely that's illegal?
is your year very short? 52 weeks in a year x 800k = £41.6m.
It's a ridiculous, untruthful number.
Your missing the transfer fee out for messi mate, circa 150 mill plus 24 mill a year for say five years, is an under estimate at about 250 mill.
very true. never gonna happen is it really?
How could that up front cost be paid outside of the club? Surely that's illegal?
I would assume a lot of personal money (signing-on fee/agents/dad/the true cost of his weekly wage) could be offset by a one-off, up-front payment, outside of Manchester City.
The push of one button is really all it would take.
Even if we promised to pay him £1m a week in wages, as long as the figure on City's books is commensurate with what he earns already, nobody would be any the wiser.
Perfectly legal, as long as the Messi family remember to pay their own private tax affairs.
Are you suggesting that a third party effectively pays that upfront amount? How is that legal?
How is it illegal?
So someone like Etisalat could offer him a wedge and that would be deemed legal,or would that be illegal because it's already a club sponsor/partner?
While not illegal, could it not be seen as a FFP dodge and some sort of 3rd party deal?Anybody can pay anybody else anything that they want, I don't see how it would be illegal.
Anybody can pay anybody else anything that they want, I don't see how it would be illegal.
While not illegal, could it not be seen as a FFP dodge and some sort of 3rd party deal?
I suppose so, but if that's right would it not be just as easy for the sponsors to give us the money and let us pay him the wages.I get where he's coming from,am I right in saying only the club show the books and a sponsor can tell UEFA to fuckoff,surely that's right?...yeah-no?
I suppose so, but if that's right would it not be just as easy for the sponsors to give us the money and let us pay him the wages.
Think we need somebody who knows, PB ?I don't know mate,I'm thinking if the sponsor pays,then it ain't no different to them giving us the money,only it won't be on our books.
Think we need somebody who knows, PB ?
Yes,I get that but I don't see the advantage of keeping it off our books, if financially it makes no difference why make it look like a dodge for UEFA to try and accuse us of trying to find a loophole in the regulations.Yeah,PB...but what I'm saying is,rather than a sponsor/partner up the deal with city,if they gave him a personal sponsorship,they get him endorsing their product,he gets his money,we get the player and there's fuck all on our books,bar the fee and an average wage...no?