Who were the "sources"? Gill and KHR?I see Nick Harris still hasn't got over his bitterness towards us. Phenomenally biased article, as always.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...eague-bans-plea-bargain-punishments-2014.html
Who were the "sources"? Gill and KHR?
Instead of being glad England has a team in the quarters he excreted this. What amazes me is they don't blink an eye at the fact Barca, Real Madrid ad Chelsea spent a fortune pre FFP, which came in just after City started spending big sums on players.
My sources tell me that Nick Harris is a ****.I see Nick Harris still hasn't got over his bitterness towards us. Phenomenally biased article, as always.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...eague-bans-plea-bargain-punishments-2014.html
You know Nick Harris' wife don't you GDM?My sources tell me that Nick Harris is a ****.
My sources tell me she thinks he's a **** alsoYou know Nick Harris' wife don't you GDM?
Like Nick Harris, I never reveal my sources.You know Nick Harris' wife don't you GDM?
Nick Harris is a ****.I ain't clicking on that shite, what's the jist of it?
Danke.Nick Harris is a ****.
According to my sources.
Nick Harris is a ****.
According to my sources.
"A press pack"What's the collective noun for a bunch of cunts?
I concur. He's one of only three people (to my knowledge) who have blocked me on Twitter, along with Jamie Jackson and Scott the Red. What's the collective noun for a bunch of cunts?
I've never seen a controversial tweet from you ever! Haha! How do you manage to get blocked?I concur. He's one of only three people (to my knowledge) who have blocked me on Twitter, along with Jamie Jackson and Scott the Red. What's the collective noun for a bunch of cunts?
And completely misleading as well. The concept of fair market value only applies to transactions with what are known as related parties and Etihad, as I've said before, is not a related party. That's a standard and long-established accounting concept and, if they were, would have been declared as such in our accounts. The fact that our owner, a private individual, is a member of the ruling family of Abu Dhabi is not enough, in itself, to make City & Etihad related parties.I see Nick Harris still hasn't got over his bitterness towards us. Phenomenally biased article, as always.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...eague-bans-plea-bargain-punishments-2014.html
Moderators?What's the collective noun for a bunch of cunts?
Plus, anyone who isn't a **** (according to my sources) would know that the Etihad deal was some way below market value in 2014, and is more significantly so, now.And completely misleading as well. The concept of fair market value only applies to transactions with what are known as related parties and Etihad, as I've said before, is not a related party. That's a standard and long-established accounting concept and, if they were, would have been declared as such in our accounts. The fact that our owner, a private individual, is a member of the ruling family of Abu Dhabi is not enough, in itself, to make City & Etihad related parties.
Therefore UEFA had no grounds to investigate or adjust these, as he's trying to imply. So this wasn't done by or on behalf of UEFA. His "independent assessor" is probably our old friend Ed Thompson.
The Qatar Tourist Authority/PSG deal was marked down to €100m I seem to recall as part of their agreement with UEFA and that was just a shirt naming deal. Etihad, at maybe €50m, covered shirts, stadium and campus.Plus, anyone who isn't a **** (according to my sources) would know that the Etihad deal was some way below market value in 2014, and is more significantly so, now.