We know what the EU are about, it is the Brexiters suggesting the pavements will be paved with gold and rainbows will shit money when the glorious empire returns.
.The Treasury ... ''Wrong'' .. ''Liars!''
Bank Of England ... ''Wrong'' .. ''Liars!''
IMF ...''Wrong'' .. ''Liars!''
US Goverment ...''Wrong'' .. ''Liars!''
IFFS ...''Wrong'' .. ''Liars!''
Hands in ears 'LaLaLa'
The Treasury ... ''Wrong'' .. ''Liars!''
Bank Of England ... ''Wrong'' .. ''Liars!''
IMF ...''Wrong'' .. ''Liars!''
US Goverment ...''Wrong'' .. ''Liars!''
IFFS ...''Wrong'' .. ''Liars!''
Hands in ears 'LaLaLa'
IMF - scared the pants out of everyone into the consequences of not joining the euro not just the UK/ also went along with the eu's medicine for Greece 5 years ago - remind me how that little project is going?
Christ, I'm a month out! Feels like it's been going on forever. Is Obama still an 'inner'?What big boys tomorrow?
It's 23rd June the vote isn't it?
I don't think anybody is saying that or indeed that we start an empire across the world. What we who are voting exit are struggling to see is actual benefits of staying or those that there are are offset by the negatives, cost, sovereignty, immigration, closer integration etc.
That's all. Out isn't going to be easy we all know that.
no they didn't, why would you make something like this up?
B.O.E - Missed a biggy with the global financial crisis? Can't remember the last inflation target they called correctly -
Is that £9bn each? I need to know as the car is due a cambelt change next month and I'm trying to budget.Here is another huge problem, this time from the WTO
The World Trade Organisation has said that if Britain leaves the EU, extra tariffs imposed on imported goods could cost the British consumer £9bn. As the Press Association reports, WTO director general Roberto Azevedo said in an interview with the Financial Times that the UK would have to negotiate membership of the organisation - as it is currently represented by the EU - and trade deals with countries around the world.
- That will wipe out what we can do with the money saved theory, Azevedo went on to say
An exit from the EU, for example, would cause the UK to lose the preferential access to other markets covered by 36 trade agreements with 58 countries negotiated by the EU. As a result, to remain compliant with WTO rules the UK would have to impose higher “most favoured nation” tariffs on imports from those 58 countries while they would have to levy their own surcharges on British exports, Mr Azevêdo said.
A WTO analysis had calculated the cost of the additional tariffs on goods imports to British consumers at £9bn, while British merchandise exports would be subject to a further £5.5bn in tariffs at their destination.
“The consumer in the UK will have to pay those duties. The UK is not in a position to decide ‘I’m not charging duties here’. That is impossible. That is illegal,” Mr Azevêdo said.
The only other option available to the UK would be removing all barriers for all WTO members, effectively turning its economy into a duty-free one like Singapore and lifting the protections politically sensitive domestic industries enjoy under the EU. “That is possible. But that is also very unlikely,” he said.
Leaving really is suicide.
Look about and read the last 430 pages.
You will get the gist.
The inners keep banging on about tarrifs if we leave.... can someone just tell me why? Why would tarriffs be introduced, moreover why would we agree to them? I am not doubting it would happen but I'd like to know why? What's changing? A pair of adidas trainers on the 23rd of June will be exactly the same pair on 24th. It seems to me the governments and money men are looking to jump back on to the financial merrygoround, so again, the original question why tarrifs....? For what purpose and benefit? More importantly whose benefit as no doubt tarrifs will be reciprocated?Here is another huge problem, this time from the WTO
The World Trade Organisation has said that if Britain leaves the EU, extra tariffs imposed on imported goods could cost the British consumer £9bn. As the Press Association reports, WTO director general Roberto Azevedo said in an interview with the Financial Times that the UK would have to negotiate membership of the organisation - as it is currently represented by the EU - and trade deals with countries around the world.
- That will wipe out what we can do with the money saved theory, Azevedo went on to say
An exit from the EU, for example, would cause the UK to lose the preferential access to other markets covered by 36 trade agreements with 58 countries negotiated by the EU. As a result, to remain compliant with WTO rules the UK would have to impose higher “most favoured nation” tariffs on imports from those 58 countries while they would have to levy their own surcharges on British exports, Mr Azevêdo said.
A WTO analysis had calculated the cost of the additional tariffs on goods imports to British consumers at £9bn, while British merchandise exports would be subject to a further £5.5bn in tariffs at their destination.
“The consumer in the UK will have to pay those duties. The UK is not in a position to decide ‘I’m not charging duties here’. That is impossible. That is illegal,” Mr Azevêdo said.
The only other option available to the UK would be removing all barriers for all WTO members, effectively turning its economy into a duty-free one like Singapore and lifting the protections politically sensitive domestic industries enjoy under the EU. “That is possible. But that is also very unlikely,” he said.
Leaving really is suicide.
Nice swerve. I've been reading this thread from the beginning and I have my view. I just want to know what yours is based on. I'm not asking for a list of pro's and con's. What I'm asking you to clarify is what the EU is ABOUT in your opinion.
Nice swerve. I've been reading this thread from the beginning and I have my view. I just want to know what yours is based on. I'm not asking for a list of pro's and con's. What I'm asking you to clarify is what the EU is ABOUT in your opinion.
I wouldn't be asking if I knew would I. What is it you are basing your judgement on? I'm asking this as a genuine question because the post by crazyadi gets to the heart of the problem. Why do you think the way you think? Knowing what we all know?Then you will know my view.
The inners keep banging on about tarrifs if we leave.... can someone just tell me why? Why would tarriffs be introduced, moreover why would we agree to them? I am not doubting it would happen but I'd like to know why? What's changing? A pair of adidas trainers on the 23rd of June will be exactly the same pair on 24th. It seems to me the governments and money men are looking to jump back on to the financial merrygoround, so again, the original question why tarrifs....? For what purpose and benefit? More importantly whose benefit as no doubt tarrifs will be reciprocated?
[QUOTE="crazyadi,
Why dont people get this and for those that do get it and are still EU sluts why??
I wouldn't be asking if I knew would I. What is it you are basing your judgement on? I'm asking this as a genuine question because the post by crazyadi gets to the heart of the problem. Why do you think the way you think?