This is all his own doing... Personally, I couldn't care less, however, regardless of what he has and hasn't done, he's a flawed keeper and overrated, imo!!
Rightly so when it comes out, which it's about to...
Just to recap a little bit...
1. It's well known Pep Guardiola wants a new goalkeeper with better distribution.
2. Pep has excluded Joe Hart from the lineup in favour of Willy so far and looks set to continue to do so.
3. Joe is according to many reports, among them from Ian Cheeseman, not taking this particular exclusion very well.
4. Joe's attitude is a massive turnoff for Pep, regardless of his abilities, and could see him ultimately sold off.
5. City have been linked to multiple goalkeepers and have already lined up Geronimo Rulli for the future, but seem set to acquire Claudio Bravo for the here and now.
The reaction in this thread is baffling, on both accounts. On one hand we have a group seemingly waiting for any opportunity to have a go at Joe for being a tit to a ballboy ages ago. On the other hand, we have some who come in flapping about how Joe is a legend, bigger than the club and all this shouldn't be happening to him. Both of these things are irrelevant.
Pep Guardiola has every right to pick his team and City will back him to the hilt. If Joe Hart doesn't fit into those plans, or worse he's actively damaging Pep's plans, then he's out. No talk of legends, no bandwagoning about ballboys. It all doesn't matter if Pep doesn't want to play Joe and, guess what? He doesn't.
No need for all that smear nonsense. There was no need it for it with Mancini and no need for it now with Hart. Pep wants to build a team entirely in his image that's fine and he has the mandate to do so just get on with it without resorting to any tedious smear bollocks.
I just don't like the way the club operate at times. Sacking Mancini was the right thing to do, getting rid of Joe is probably the right thing to do. I just don't see why they have to justify it with a smear campaign afterwards. If shit happened whilst they're at City and the club were happy to keep it quiet, then it's more than a bit fucking snidey to use it as an excuse to get the fans onside afterwards. It's snide and it's underhand.
Completely flawed, overrated and worse yet believes his own hype.
Why is saying he should leave as a legend flapping? do you dismiss his achievements when he has gone? that is a nonsense,he will always be a big part in our best years,be gracious and say thanks and goodbye
Yeah good luck with that. I think the saddest thing about all this is how there are a select few people on here who are so very gleefully happy Joe is going. They're not happy we're getting an improvement goalkeeper, they're happy Joe has got the boot. I just think that is sad as he has given his all to our club for the last 10 years, been with us on our journey of being shit to winning trophies, and has put in some truly amazing performances, especially in Europe where he spared our blushes many a time.
We have to get fully behind Pep and if that means Joe has to go then so be it. But he deserves the respect and appreciation he has earned over the last 10 years.
No need for all that smear nonsense. There was no need it for it with Mancini and no need for it now with Hart. Pep wants to build a team entirely in his image that's fine and he has the mandate to do so just get on with it without resorting to any tedious smear bollocks.
Why is saying he should leave as a legend flapping? do you dismiss his achievements when he has gone? that is a nonsense,he will always be a big part in our best years,be gracious and say thanks and goodbye
It won't come from within the club.Is that because we'll see another character assassination like the one on Mancini.
We are in agreement then,if he has to go so be itNot at all, I love Joe Hart and am dismayed to see him leaving, but it is what it is. No player is bigger than the club.
That Joe will leave a legend has always been assured. He's a legend. His running, arms outstretched after the Aguero goal is immortal, statue worthy even. But beyond that he's been a key part of our success for years, our engine, our Hart/Heart.
Noone is denying that at all. Nor is anyone denying him his thanks, except for a few assholes who appear to be trolling. What I am saying though is that it's Pep's call and we all have to move on. It was going to happen some time, why not now?
Guardiola does not have to earn anyone's respect.If I felt that Joe had been given a fair chance by Guardiola I would say ok, let him go, but he has only played one game for Guardiola and that was not in the PL. As I said when Guardiola was appointed I'll support him because he is our Manager but I am not going to say that he is the greatest manager in the world until he proves it with City. So I have/am giving him respect, but I don't feel that he is giving Joe respect. The way Guardiola has backed Sterling, when the media had it in for him, was superb but the media also had it in for Joe after the England fiasco and he has not come out and backed Joe.
And before you say respect has to be earned, that works both ways. Joe has to earn Guardiola's respect and vice versa. IMHO
This whole thing really fucking rubs me the wrong way.
This is all his own doing... Personally, I couldn't care less, however, regardless of what he has and hasn't done, he's a flawed keeper and overrated, imo!!
Thanks Zin I remember your intel on Mario so will never doubt your word. I think think he is a cocky player who is not very good in the air, on his feet, distributing the ball, low shots.
His only strength seems to be shot blocking.
What did he do to Bobby?