Aguero banned for three games (updated)

[johnmc]

So we are going to call the ref a liar? Can't see that going well.

Clear as day the ref saw it. To overrule him or for him to change his mind, whether right or wrong, is setting a precedent for retro refereeing of games. Another new rule made for us. Therefore that would be the argument I would make.

Also if it's a hearing I would refer to felani incidents as well as numerous bad calls we got last season including several penalties not given, penalties against that were given and unreal offsides against us. About time we got something in our favour.

 

[johnmc]

Ha! Totally the wrong angle to judge fairly.

It clearly shows contact with the face. Doesn't matter the angle.

 

[Thebigbluehouse]

For those saying no contact

http://www.skysports.com/football/news/11095/10556960/ref-watch

You need to look at it the other angle only.his forearm touches his neck

If that was all we had to go by, you would also be looking into Reid punching Aguero in the face.

 

[dom]

Good post..

 

[johnmc]

If that was all we had to go by, you would also be looking into Reid punching Aguero in the face.

Well yes I thought that but Reid hasn't been charged.

 

[SWP's back]

But from the angle I've posted you can see the point of contact. Look at reids face. You can't do that with your face unless there is contact.

Only one angle needs to show no contact as well you know.

 

[SWP's back]

Ha! Totally the wrong angle to judge fairly.

He's wumming bud.

 

[johnmc]

Only one angle needs to show no contact as well you know.

But the debate is whether there was contact. Several angles will show no contact but if just one shows contact all the others are irrelevant aren't they?

 

[Jazzman]

If that was all we had to go by, you would also be looking into Reid punching Aguero in the face.

There is more contact between Reids fist and Agueros face than the other way around.

 

[SWP's back]

But from the angle I've posted you can see the point of contact. Look at reids face. You can't do that with your face unless there is contact.

You can't pout without contact?

 

[SPIDERBOY]

He's wumming bud.

Has to be.

 

[johnmc]

He's wumming bud.

I'm not Shaun. They is clearly contact. I'm not sure how anyone can deny it. I can understand why they deny but there is contact.

 

[SWP's back]

But the debate is whether there was contact. Several angles will show no contact but if just one shows contact all the others are irrelevant aren't they?

No. That's not how it works. If one shows daylight between elbow and player than any other angle is irrelevant.

I'm not actually cross with you, I'm cross with myself for indulging you on your fishing trip.

 

[SWP's back]

I'm not Shaun. They is clearly contact. I'm not sure how anyone can deny it. I can understand why they deny but there is contact.

They can deny after watching footage from head on showing no contact.

 

[birchvillablue]

FA Kangaroo court, where the procecuter is a ref, the witness is a ref, and they jury are all refs...

 

[kaz7]

Why do blues wum other blues? i just don't get it

 

[fredmont]

But the debate is whether there was contact. Several angles will show no contact but if just one shows contact all the others are irrelevant aren't they?

It's doesn't show contact, it shows Sergio's elbow behind Reid's jaw.

 

[fredmont]

FA Kangaroo court, where the procecuter is a ref, the witness is a ref, and they jury are all refs...

Johnmc a ref?

 

[g180aj]

For those saying no contact

http://www.skysports.com/football/news/11095/10556960/ref-watch

That also shows Reid's fist on Aguero's face!!!

 

[johnmc]

They can deny after watching footage from head on showing no contact.

Ok. If you believe there was no contact and aren't going to alter that view after the photo I've posted then that's up to you.

Thw offence itself is possibly only worth a yellow but now it's taken off the pitch it's nothing or red.

 

[johnmc]

That also shows Reid's fist on Aguero's face!!!

Yep. But Reid hasn't a charge to answer unfortunately