9/11 documentary now

  • Thread starter Thread starter worsleyweb
  • Start date Start date
Still.... jet fuel can't melt steel beams and Lucky Larry did say "Pull it " regarding WTC7
David_Dees_Larry_Silverstein_and_Giuliani_demolition.jpg
 
CTID1988 said:
What did they have to gain from demolishing building 7? Insurance?
Click to expand...
I'm not sure that was the entire motive. There is the rumour a lot of sensitive documents were in WTC7 but interestingly, Lucky Larry already had design plans for a new WTC7 as early as April 2000 and
Lucky Larry said:
Next thing ya know we started tha construction shawtly after in 2002
Click to expand...
Amazing eh? A new designed WTC7 whilst the old one was still there!!??
Good thing for Larry was the 'terrorist attack' insurance policies he took out on his twin towers. After the $100,000,000 investment into a 99 year lease Larry saw the twin towers destroyed when jet fuel melted steel beams. He got an instant cash payout. But, because two buildings were hit by two aeroplanes that meant double the attack and got paid twice. Somewhere around $4,500,000,000
A fair recompense for that investment of his eh?
A good thing he weren't in the twin towers that fateful day like he normally was. A really lucky bastard that Larry Silverstein...
larryTN.jpg
 
manctheknife said:
Interesting points. I have always assumed, wrongly perhaps that shear studs offer very little support to vertical loads, but are there to resist horizontal movement.
The time delay floor to floor was only until the critical load was reached, after that it went down at a gravitational lick...
Now, what is your actual theory of how it collapsed, given that mine is nonsense, and bearing in mind of course that it did, actually collapse.
Click to expand...

But your nonsense is based on a beam being displaced horizontal to allow the floor to drop, tied in both sides of the beam the force could have effected only one side of the floor showing as a partial collapse and warping to the outer wall, not seen on the footage, nor was ANY time delay because that would show as acceleration instead of zero to free-fall.


80 beams tied in with cross beams and 4000 shear studs locking off horizontal movement can not all give up the ghost at the exact same moment, yet you want to give credence to a spread out office furniture fire produced enough heat to have everything fail structurally at the exact same instant ?.

It was a controlled demolition
 
blueonblue said:
But your nonsense is based on a beam being displaced horizontal to allow the floor to drop, tied in both sides of the beam the force could have effected only one side of the floor showing as a partial collapse and warping to the outer wall, not seen on the footage, nor was ANY time delay because that would show as acceleration instead of zero to free-fall.


80 beams tied in with cross beams and 4000 shear studs locking off horizontal movement can not all give up the ghost at the exact same moment, yet you want to give credence to a spread out office furniture fire produced enough heat to have everything fail structurally at the exact same instant ?.

It was a controlled demolition
Click to expand...

You dont know that for certain, Hardly fair to call it an office furniture fire when a fucking plane had just hammered it at 400 miles an hour.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top