Maybe he's a close confidant to Pep and he wants him there. You'd think with your username you might understand. Not sure what the big deal is.Yeah it is, I just don't see what purpose it serves.
Maybe he's a close confidant to Pep and he wants him there. You'd think with your username you might understand. Not sure what the big deal is.Yeah it is, I just don't see what purpose it serves.
Except no one said it's a big dealMaybe he's a close confidant to Pep and he wants him there. You'd think with your username you might understand. Not sure what the big deal is.
Too right.
Having seen the incident a couple of times now, can somebody tell me why Van der Hoorn wasn't sent off? The ref clearly saw it so why no red card? It was a shocking deliberate elbow and it really could have broken Kev's jaw. A horrible piece of play that was totally unnecessary.
Anyone who calls that 'soft' has to have a pathological hatred of City.
Infuriating! Sky's summation of the van der hoorn strike on KdB... 'not sure it was a pen?????' WTF? What was the difference between van der hoorns face strike on Kev and Sergios hand to face that caused the Sky witch hunt to get Kun banned???? The agenda hasn't gone away IMO
Very true. We've been better than every team we've played.There's not one game this season we haven't deserved to win - regardless of the odd shaky moment.
Yeah it is, I just don't see what purpose it serves.
I think you may be rather exaggerating the severity of the contact mate. 'Shocking' it wasn't.Too right.
Having seen the incident a couple of times now, can somebody tell me why Van der Hoorn wasn't sent off? The ref clearly saw it so why no red card? It was a shocking deliberate elbow and it really could have broken Kev's jaw. A horrible piece of play that was totally unnecessary.
Anyone who calls that 'soft' has to have a pathological hatred of City.
Well why bring it up then?Except no one said it's a big deal
Agreed.Just watched it. Should have scored 5. But iffy first half with some sloppy passing. Battered them second half and should have scored more from some very good positions.
Looked like gundogan was closer to dinho first half and kdb was inside a lot more. Looked unbalanced. Second half we went to the normal midfield shape with silva wider and kdb/gundogan central and we were much better.
If Raheem could kick a ball properly he would have scored 3 today. Other than his shooting he was excellent.
Well why bring it up then?
Both on Wednesday and yesterday almost ever killer pass was a little short. I'm not making excuses for the players but maybe there was an issue with the pitch? I also noticed quite a few slipping, Sagna a prime example for the goal.