Donald Trump

[Newman Noggs]

The most enjoyable aspect of this result is the type of people it has enraged.

 

[The Light Was Yellow Sir]

You're forgetting Emma Bridgwater mugs. They're nice.

At least Theresa hasn't agreed one of the largest infrastructure projects in history, in a largely unproven new nuclear technology, and awarded the contract to a French company, backed by Chinese money!

 

[JULES]

The most enjoyable aspect of this result is the type of people it has enraged.

10/10 for that post , I couldn't have put it better myself

 

[MCFC1993]

The most enjoyable aspect of this result is the type of people it has enraged.

Yeah I must admit, watching celebrities rage as they thought their vote represented the the average person has been quite amusing.

 

[SWP's back]

How'd the popular vote end up?

 

[the god Gerry Gow]

Personally an IQ test with a minimum pass mark of 100 (mean average) would be a good start. Then we wouldn't have half the votes cast by people below mean average intelligence.

They wouldn't need to register with me, I'm sure a panel could be set up. I'm rather busy as it is.

To answer your question seriously, no, perhaps we can't ban idiots and people with ghastly views from voting and this is the problem with democracy. As Churchill said "the best argument against democracy is a conversation with the average voter".

Ps, if racists or homophobes aren't a problem for you then have a good evening and I'd rather not bother conversing with you going forward.

My problem is with people trying to decide who should vote and who shouldn't. Smacks of facism to me.
Try using a cohesive argument. Course if that's a problem for you just block me

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

What do you expect? "Hitler invades Poland" - now, Herr Goebbels, for the record (or rather the Daily Mail), can you give us a bit of balance?

I wasn't aware that Trump had already invaded another sovreign nation, and all before his inauguration.

What right does the publicly funded BBC have to hold a corporate opinion on this election and, worse, for it to infest its editorial output to such an extent?

 

[argyle]

She'll be too busy calling everyone racist and sexist for disagreeing with her. Why anyone even gives her the time of day is beyond me

To be fair, Trump went after the votes of the racist and sexist quite unapologetically.

I don't get how we've got in a situation where someone calling people out on their bigotry is somehow worse than someone being a bigot?

 

[argyle]

How'd the popular vote end up?

Clinton won the popular vote.

 

[ballinio]

The most enjoyable aspect of this result is the type of people it has enraged.

A delight isn't it

 

[levets]

R.E.A.C.H accreditation is a useless eu directive where i paid 700 quid to get it, never even heard the name since, any labeling or people checking etc etc, nothing not a single peep since we paid for it and nobody seems to use it. That was a useless direct tax on my fathers company and the eu iso accreditation that enabled company's to force me to legally defend our companies intellectual property which of course costs money. I should add the business we are in already has strict protocols for stuff like delivering xyz chemical and these laws/directives did nothing to help besides act as a tax and add a forest of red tape.

So there are two from me :-D that said we are going slightly off topic here i think.

And from my experience of importing, only British companies seem to comply with it. Anyway, back to the topic.

 

[malg]

I wasn't aware that Trump had already invaded another sovreign nation, and all before his inauguration.

What right does the publicly funded BBC have to hold a corporate opinion on this election and, worse, for it to infest its editorial output to such an extent?

The BBC have been at it for the entirety of the campaign. However, I don't think that would surprise anyone.

 

[malg]

The most enjoyable aspect of this result is the type of people it has enraged.

Bit like the Brexit vote.

 

[SWP's back]

My problem is with people trying to decide who should vote and who shouldn't. Smacks of facism to me.
Try using a cohesive argument. Course if that's a problem for you just block me

You're the one suggesting that all opinions are equal.

I've never blocked anyone, I usually ground them down long before I get bored.

 

[arfurclue]

My problem is with people trying to decide who should vote and who shouldn't. Smacks of facism to me.
Try using a cohesive argument. Course if that's a problem for you just block me

Plato the original fascist?

 

[levets]

And thereby contradict your statement about conversing with racist/homophobes within a single page....well done sir1

Exactly. You beat me to it. What a spanner.

 

[SWP's back]

Clinton won the popular vote.

Cheers

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

The BBC have been at it for the entirety of the campaign. However, I don't think that would surprise anyone.

I think it's difficult for any news organisation to remain entirely impartial - it's unrealistic to expect perfection in that regard, but the BBC's bias has been so blatant and egregious (you only need to see the 'experts' they had on, commentating on the result) that it's really got on my tits, as it displays a supreme level of arrogance - which also isn't altogether surprising.

 

[SWP's back]

Exactly. You beat me to it. What a spanner.

1) I wasn't conversing with Clarkson
2) he's not a homophobe
3) he's not a racist.

So well done you on getting beaten to being incorrect. Spanner indeed.

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

1) I wasn't conversing with Clarkson
2) he's not a homophobe
3) he's not a racist.

So well done you on getting beaten to being incorrect. Spanner indeed.

I've always thought of you more as a lump hammer.