haha. Aye. It's all relativeHave I just seen Scott Sinclair called a big gun??
haha. Aye. It's all relativeHave I just seen Scott Sinclair called a big gun??
Oh right I'd genuinely never heard of that ,i must live under a rock or something.Not necessarily a Scottish or an Irish person but the widespread coverage Celtic's Palestinian protest reveived and the subsequent fundraising I was just wondering.
Tim here is my take on it. Regarding opposition fans going where they "should,nt" be, frankly there has been some precious posts in this thread by some City fans. Loads of blues have done this all over the UK and Europe. It is however only twats who do not respect that they are in an area of a ground where it is not only sensible but a matter of good manners to behave appropriately. Sometimes that may involve keeping quiet, sometimes it might be ok to cheer your team on....but you dont go in there wearing colours or indeed taking the piss in anyway. I am sure plenty of Celtic fans did behave appropriately and were welcomed by blues.
Regardless of which part of the stadium you are in, singing songs, chanting, flying flags that may involve offending the natives, such as those chants or songs that may attack our armed forces or indeed glorify a terrorist group that bombed and killed both servicemen and civilians in this country is not acceptable.
Infact anyone who feels otherwise should not even be in this country for any reason whatsoever in my humble opinion. Ironic dont you think that to even say such a thing can get you accused of all kinds of nonsense here in England these days, yet some of your support seem to be free to spout pro IRA bile. To compare it with singing songs about Munich is wide of the mark, after all Munich was an accident a totally different thing. Attacks on British servicemen and civilians were cerainly not For the record as someone mentioned City were not without loss in the Munich disaster, and the songs about it are moronic and have long since been almost universally accepted as such.
Oh right I'd genuinely never heard of that ,i must live under a rock or something.
Anyone see the lad with the Paratroopers flag? Made me chuckle, good lad.
Septic lived up to their reputation as terrorist loving scum bags last night.
I hate those hats. And the jackets that have the glasses on the hoodOne of the Celtic fans kept going to the nearest steward to complain only for him to chuck his lighter over when there was a minor disturbance.
The arsehole was wearing one of those stupid hats with goggles attached
I hate those hats. And the jackets that have the glasses on the hood
Well said. What was depressing to me was that the Celtic fans at the first match seemed to get behind the team properly without as much of the politics.
A good post overall. I wasn't comparing the two to Munich. The guy I made that reply to was acting as if your fans were whiter than white. I completely get the hostility our songbook etc attracts. Esp in England. FWIW you can get jail for singing those in Scotland. Complete over reaction. It that's what the offensive behaviour at football act brought in
Have I just seen Scott Sinclair called a big gun??
The majority of fans do not get involved with this. Our away support are more likely to. Not all if us agree with using the club as a political vehicle.
It saddens me.
What steps does the club take to discourage sectarianism? I assume certain banners and flags are removed by the stewards on match days, and the perpetrators of sectarian chanting are given lengthy stadium bans?The majority of fans do not get involved with this. Our away support are more likely to. Not all if us agree with using the club as a political vehicle.
It saddens me.
What steps does the club take to discourage sectarianism? I assume certain banners and flags are removed by the stewards on match days, and the perpetrators of sectarian chanting are given lengthy stadium bans?
Good post but Celtic pamper far too much to the green brigade.It is an offence in Scotland to sing certain sectarian or political songs. You can be arrested. As for the club doing more? They don't want this but it is difficult to change. The troubles of Ireland have been going for 800 years after it was colonised and planted with Scots and English.
A statement or increased measures might help but it's a deep historical problem that both Glasgow Clubs are embroiled in due to their respective supports.
I had hoped that after the peace process things would ease up. I'm still hoping. I hate religion of any sort and it's involvement in football is an ugly stain.
In short, there is no simple answer. As long as people teach their kids to hate someone because if religion there isn't much a football club can do.
Good post but Celtic pamper far too much to the green brigade.
They have continually let the club down but still they are there.
They should have been disbanded years ago.
Good, I'm glad both Glasgow clubs are doing everything they possibly can to change sectarian attitudes amongst their support. There was me thinking that past colonial exploitation and historical religious differences were conveniently used to justify how difficult change is in the present. I used to think both clubs were reluctant to instigate change because sectarian ego was part of their core branding.It is an offence in Scotland to sing certain sectarian or political songs. You can be arrested. As for the club doing more? They don't want this but it is difficult to change. The troubles of Ireland have been going for 800 years after it was colonised and planted with Scots and English.
A statement or increased measures might help but it's a deep historical problem that both Glasgow Clubs are embroiled in due to their respective supports.
I had hoped that after the peace process things would ease up. I'm still hoping. I hate religion of any sort and it's involvement in football is an ugly stain.
In short, there is no simple answer. As long as people teach their kids to hate someone because if religion there isn't much a football club can do.
Good, I'm glad both Glasgow clubs are doing everything they possibly can to change sectarian attitudes amongst their support. There was me thinking that past colonial exploitation and historical religious differences were convenient justifications used to validate how difficult change is in the present. I used to think both clubs were reluctant to instigate change because sectarian ego was part of their core branding.
I can't believe the huge impact of these ongoing measures hasn't been obvious to me before.
If you have a problem, then add religious hatred into the mix, it can become intractable. Both clubs have benefitted from it financially over the decades, you're bang on there.
It's now a bit of an embarrassment but they haven't really got the power to change attitudes on a societal level. Banning songs sometimes makes the signing of them an act of defiance for both sides.
It is a sad state of affairs, our adherence and differing interpretation of man made invisible man in the sky fables, sees the same old lines being drawn and redrawn down the centuries.
Everybody has right and their version of their fictitious god on their side.
It's FUBAR.
It's described as intractable because it's convenient to both clubs (and many other institutions) to view it that way. It's hatred rooted in mediaeval hocus pocus; of course it can be sorted, but that can only happen when people stop saying it's intractable. As you say, it's very sad.