FogBlueInSanFran
Well-Known Member
The point is that people can vote for whichever candidate they want and don't have to give a valid reason as to why they did vote the way they did. You may have a view, I may have a view (and I generally agree with yours btw) but unless you've got a PR system and a wider choice of candidates people have to vote for someone who may not be ideal.
Not many candidates are ever ideal, but normally the vetting process does not result in a candidate with a 25-year history of pathological behavior with absolutely no experience serving the people of a nation in ANY capacity whatsoever. And even if it does, it's at levels like, say, Mayor, or Congressional Representative . . . Sonny Bono, e.g., or his wife, who took his place after he died. The Presidential vetting process should be 100 times as stringent.
But it wasn't. Arguably for either party.