Harry Kane

Maybe, but in my opinion, i can't see how Grealish is valued higher than Raheem.
An in form Raheem brings pace, assists and goalscoring at the highest level of the game.

Having longer left on his contract is about the only part where there is a higher value in comparison to Sterling's. In every other aspect, Sterling should be worth more. A lot more.
 
Laporte knows hes getting 36-40 matches but he also knows Dias & stones will play in every big game inc champs final & there lies the problem.
A few months ago, Stones was portrayed by many on here as a Big Issue seller. Laporte was light years ahead.

The situation is fluid.
 
He is 28 in a few weeks..just struggle to see City paying Levy sums of money for a player who may only have 4/5 years left, bearing in mind the injury risk which may become more prominent due to age. If the price is right and Haaland is not an option he is a great alternative.Just can not see Levy being reasonable. If the sums reported are correct, Haaland or Mbappe make so much more sense.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.