Liverpool (H) | PL | Post Match Thread

mancboy said:
View attachment 174567
Victims living up to their name.
Click to expand...
all you heard on the radio today IF we went in 1:1 different game - they are simply trying ignore our second...even if they equalised they were so far off us we may have made it 2:1 and probably would have been a little more decisive first 20 of second half, we were far better side, even when we gave them the ball and let them come to us. There is no bigger bunch of c*nts then them lot. Such a bunch of knobs a lot of them, yet the media fawn all over these weirdos from Bristol and Northampton and Denmark......rags included. We shouldn't call then scousers as so many aren't but try and pretend its some badge of honour! rant over
 
What next? On a disallowed goal

A Netflix documentary?

Questions raised in parliament?

Every team gets good and bad decisions (especially when your the away team at Anfield).

Pathetic.
 
pepguardiola'smoustache said:
I can't remember which clown it was after the game, think it was michael owen, sorry to him if it wasn't,
but some ex-dipper pundit said that there was no way haaland knew anything about the header, he wasn't expecting it and it came off the top of his head.
Some piece of fortune that, eh.
Click to expand...

FWIW, I don’t think he meant it either! Haha. But he deserves every bit of slight fortune that comes his way.
 
Paladin said:
Good spot that. The laws go on to say that this should result in a retake only if the action (in this case the goalkeeper causing the crossbar to vibrate as Haaland was preparing to take the kick) has a detrimental impact on the kicker. It probably didn't.
Click to expand...
Just no fuss about another subjective decision.
 
KS55 said:
And Pep is innovative and influences the wider game. Fergusson was a pragmatic 4-4-2 guy whose influence beyond the rags was negligible.
Click to expand...
What are the biggest teams that any of Fergie's ex-players have managed ?
Hughes managed City before the takeover and Steve Bruce has overseen Sunderland.
Don't think any of the others have managed big clubs ?
Already Arteta and Maresca are managing Arsenal & Chelsea...
 
malg said:
That's a good stat. He didn't do the eye catching stuff but like Bernardo he put a fucking shift in.
Click to expand...
Foden was like a Duracell Bunny yesterday.
He has regained that confidence to turn, change direction and move with ball so quickly.
He is also m, once again, trying to thread that killer pass, usually to Big Erl.
I hope he doesn't play for England this International Break, as the poor bugger looks to have also regained his fitness...
 
Carragher's analysis of the 1st goal is quite good. He pinpoints weakness in Konate and Van Dijk. Nunes had space to play the cross because Van Dijk didn't want to be out wide where he found himself, and the chance comes as Van Dijk and Robertson change places. This IMO is an example of how Van Dijk's lack of mobility is leading to chances and goals against Liverpool.

Sky's Analysis (Carragher)
 
Bald fraud said:
These fuckers know exactly what they’re doing. Kick up that much of a stink and the officials will be terrified to give a decision against them. Works every time
Click to expand...

It will be if that is the result of their outcry, and will further demonstrate the impact PiGMOL has in affecting the outcomes of games,
 
cleavers said:
I commented on this in MOTM thread yesterday, and it's not for the first time either that these 2 have done it.
Click to expand...
I know he is likely to be off in the Summer but Bernardo has at least another season in him at this level.
He has been immense for us and has been as valuable to us as some of those with statues.
Hates scousers too.
The type of player that rubs off on those around him. Bit like Tevez
 
Marvin. said:
Carragher's analysis of the 1st goal is quite good. He pinpoints weakness in Konate and Van Dijk. Nunes had space to play the cross because Van Dijk didn't want to be out wide where he found himself, and the chance comes as Van Dijk and Robertson change places. This IMO is an example of how Van Dijk's lack of mobility is leading to chances and goals against Liverpool.

Sky's Analysis (Carragher)
Click to expand...
Also, they didn’t find themselves out of position by accident. We were pulling them all over the place.
Doku on the left, cherkie on the right, gonzo stuck in the middle
I’m sure there is a song there
 
Marvin. said:
Carragher's analysis of the 1st goal is quite good. He pinpoints weakness in Konate and Van Dijk. Nunes had space to play the cross because Van Dijk didn't want to be out wide where he found himself, and the chance comes as Van Dijk and Robertson change places. This IMO is an example of how Van Dijk's lack of mobility is leading to chances and goals against Liverpool.

Sky's Analysis (Carragher)
Click to expand...
That’s actually quite an interesting piece, spitty actually capable of decent analysis for once.
 
Alan Harper's Tash said:
It’s not as simple as that though. Bernardo also moves when Stones scores last season.

The biggest difference is that Robertson is on the same side of the goal as where the ball goes, so I can see that there is more scope for him to be deemed offside.

Had we had the goal disallowed, the VAR/ref threads would be going berserk.

It’s one of those marginal decisions where you could justify both sides and not be wrong. I’m just glad it went our way this time.
Click to expand...
Please stop this talking sense crap.... ;-)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top