PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

bluemc said:
I'm going to assume that an article from "Spurs Web" adds nothing of note and says something along the lines of "City bad"?
Click to expand...
Mentions Levy as we already know having full intentions to cause as much possible shit for City if the decision went against us.

It also mentions -
The journalist explained that the delay in getting a verdict has caused a split among the Premier League clubs, with some clubs wanting to shelve the case since it damages the competition’s brand, while others are pressing for a proper conclusion.

The exits of Levy and Lewis have apparently ‘tempered anxiety’, ‘diluted tension’ and ‘taken some of the heat out of the situation’.

Quotes Miguel Delaney though, so probably bollocks from that fúckwit.
 
Centurions said:
You think the clubs will give up the preseason money making tours? Don't forget that the rags had their first ever postseason tour last summer, although it seemed to be a resounding failure I wouldn't be surprised to see other clubs trying it in the future.
Click to expand...
You’re probably right ……but surely that could still happen either before or better after the qualifying?

They’d still end up playing the same amount of games as there’d be no international breaks so the season could be finished a few weeks quicker.
 
Rule 3WB.
Mods on your leading fan site must at all times wear basque and stockings.
Luckily, we haven’t broken that one.
 
SilvaisSkyBlue said:
Not sure if already posted on here, from a couple of days ago.

https://www.spurs-web.com/spurs-new...lay-ahead-of-verdict-on-115-man-city-charges/
Click to expand...
Interesting if true. We all speculated that levy and Lewis departures had some relation to 115 but again shut down as conspiracy nut jobs. It does make you ponder what is going on behind the scenes…

Legally the result should have been out, something is holding this up.

We seem to have cut 2 heads off the snake.

 
Last edited:
Paladin said:
Assuming we win and are awarded costs, it would be good to see the PLs costs distributed according to earnings, and not split evenly.
Click to expand...
Maybe that is part of the delay (no idea) but the apportioning of costs could be a factor.
The number of teams which have been in the premier league since Citys' charges began must be about 40.
How do you sort out who pays what? And then there are clubs who have already been fined who may be/ may have been borderline ffp failures. (eg the rags).
Then what about recently promoted clubs who were never in the P/L when Citys' charges were instigated, surely they should be exempt?
So many variables.
 
SilvaisSkyBlue said:
Mentions Levy as we already know having full intentions to cause as much possible shit for City if the decision went against us.

It also mentions -
The journalist explained that the delay in getting a verdict has caused a split among the Premier League clubs, with some clubs wanting to shelve the case since it damages the competition’s brand, while others are pressing for a proper conclusion.

The exits of Levy and Lewis have apparently ‘tempered anxiety’, ‘diluted tension’ and ‘taken some of the heat out of the situation’.

Quotes Miguel Delaney though, so probably bollocks from that fúckwit.
Click to expand...
Miguel Delooney is not a fuckwit……he’s a bona fide ****
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top