NZBlue
Well-Known Member
The two are not mutually exclusive. He can be bothMiguel Delooney is not a fuckwit……he’s a bona fide ****
The two are not mutually exclusive. He can be bothMiguel Delooney is not a fuckwit……he’s a bona fide ****
Go to bedThe two are not mutually exclusive. He can be both
You know how time zones work, right?Go to bed
Well City are one of themI'm sure we could all guess those clubs
I may be wrong but all it would do is reduce the payouts going forward, it would be an absolute shit show any other way.Maybe that is part of the delay (no idea) but the apportioning of costs could be a factor.
The number of teams which have been in the premier league since Citys' charges began must be about 40.
How do you sort out who pays what? And then there are clubs who have already been fined who may be/ may have been borderline ffp failures. (eg the rags).
Then what about recently promoted clubs who were never in the P/L when Citys' charges were instigated, surely they should be exempt?
So many variables.
Just get the teams who signed the letter to pay.Maybe that is part of the delay (no idea) but the apportioning of costs could be a factor.
The number of teams which have been in the premier league since Citys' charges began must be about 40.
How do you sort out who pays what? And then there are clubs who have already been fined who may be/ may have been borderline ffp failures. (eg the rags).
Then what about recently promoted clubs who were never in the P/L when Citys' charges were instigated, surely they should be exempt?
So many variables.
I think it's fair to say that the PL votes would not have gone through if deals had not been made with those middle clubs.Just get the teams who signed the letter to pay.
I may be wrong but all it would do is reduce the payouts going forward, it would be an absolute shit show any other way.
A quote from page one of the thread.On your marks get set go.
I'm fairly sure that I've seen that there is one (from on here), any money left over is distributed amongst the clubs but given how long this has been going on, if we get some of our fees paid by the PL then there won't be any left over for awhile.Is it likely that there is a contingency fund at the PL which is a cut of the income before distribution?
It seems crazy to have an organisation of that size without one.
Expect it to be reported that the verdict is "imminent" around two weeks before the next international break.So we get through this break with no news, when's the next guess for a new date?
Actually wouldn't surprise me, total joke this delay.Expect it to be reported that the verdict is "imminent" around two weeks before the next international break.
Interesting if true. We all speculated that levy and Lewis departures had some relation to 115 but again shut down as conspiracy nut jobs. It does make you ponder what is going on behind the scenes…
Legally the result should have been out, something is holding this up.
We seem to have cut 2 heads off the snake.
It seems plausible that there would be a rift among PL clubs. The old FFP regs have been totally discredited and a lot of clubs face paying a huge legal bill. Some of them must be getting nervous.Interesting if only to confirm, apparently, that Levy really wanted us punished and strict PSR rules kept.
Then he suddenly left PL football.
The toxic media briefings from the Rags against City stopped as soon as Ratcliffe came in. My gut feeling is that he wants to attract Middle East money for the circus tent project. Anti-Arab sentiment is not a good way to do that.Let’s not forget Ratcliffe after claiming City had done nothing wrong, sacked United CEO Richard Arnold
He is in the petrochemical industry ands deals the Arab world all the time.The toxic media briefings from the Rags against City stopped as soon as Ratcliffe came in. My gut feeling is that he wants to attract Middle East money for the circus tent project. Anti-Arab sentiment is not a good way to do that.
Did they? Is there proof of that, I mean what makes you think that? I wasnt watching.The toxic media briefings from the Rags against City stopped as soon as Ratcliffe came in. My gut feeling is that he wants to attract Middle East money for the circus tent project. Anti-Arab sentiment is not a good way to do that.