OK, so a few points back for discussion...
1 - still cant get past the fact that FG tickets are actually pretty useful for those on a budget, or cant get to every game for the multitude of reasons we all know. If the club made the admin charge something more sensible (or better still withdrew it) and reset the match price to ST pricing, then what's the difference?
2 - you're still butting up against the idea that on one hand we want flexibility to transfer tickets to others in our friends groupings (either formal or not) yet don't want away fans in the home end. What would you class as a "big game"? - Leeds? Sunderland? Any....
So, yes, fully agree to make it easier to buy tickets, but you risk opening it up to away fans finding it easier as well...
There's a huge challenge about the Galatasery game - I suspect the club will be very wary of opening this up to as many fans as possible as it'll get filled with away fans like happened at OT the other year.
What I’ve put forward are only ideas to increase the attendances and make it easier for City fans to buy tickets. General discussion, nothing more. Obviously my ideas aren’t happening.
The difference is the unnecessary FG charge. The club won’t do away with that now. It will bring in too much money going forward. The 3 day buying window is another issue with people admitting on here they have forgotten to buy their ticket in the 3 day window and have missed out on their ticket. A normal season ticket which most of us still have would negate those issues.
Transferring tickets to family and friends doesn’t bring away fans into the home ends. It fills what would be empty seats in the home ends with City fans. Away fans buying tickets and hospitality tickets on ticket touting websites, some partnered with the club, brings away fans into the home ends. Along ticket touts, City fans, etc, listing and selling their tickets on ticket touting websites, which needs to be clamped down on by City and all the other PL clubs.
As we’ve discussed, as in all of us on here, the club are making the problem of away fans in the home ends worse as they are giving their ticket touting website partners tickets in the home ends to sell. If City sold every match ticket and hospitality ticket through the clubs official ticket page, the chances of away fans en-masse being in the home ends would be much smaller or pretty much non existent, bar the determined away fan/s who would buy a Citizen membership, which to be fair to City, is impossible to stop.Playing Devils Advocate to the club.
I fully agree with purchase history criteria for the big games, United, Liverpool, Arsenal, Chelsea, etc, and for the possible flash point games, where away fans can be troublesome in the home ends like Celtic, Leeds, Galatasaray, etc. It doesn’t help when the club sells citizen cards, just to get more money in, like they did before the Real Madrid game, which caused lots of problems, and prompted a fan backlash. There have been plenty occasions, on-going, where City have had to take 100% responsibility for their actions in the pursuit of increased match day revenue.
Unfortunately with most other PL clubs going down the official ticketing touting partner route, there is absolutely no chance of that changing at City either. In fact, it will probably get worse with an extra 8000 seats to sell and fill next season.
I can see the new Medlock Hotel and it’s 401 rooms being another gateway for away fans into the home ends and NSL2.
I’ll admit not all ticketing issues can be sorted out. But there are ticket issues of the clubs own making that can and should be sorted out by the club going forward.
BTW. I forgot to reply to you last lengthy reply. Just remembered. Apologies. :-)