PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

pepguardiola'smoustache said:
well.
i have had an idea...

once the club are found to have nothing to answer for,
why don't we, the collective bluemoon members who have contributed to this thread,
commence a civil case against the premier league for damages?

i'm sure the honourable (and not so honourable) posters on here (we all know who i'm talking about) could muster up the necessary legal specifics between themselves to bring it to court.

i believe we'd have to first formally write to the fuckers and ask for a reply with 14 days to our claim for initial compo otherwise we'll take them to the cleaners.

this thread alone certainly must be extremely strong evidence that the whole 115 thing has made us all into mentalists from the stress of it.
(i realise most of us were already lunatics anyway but we could easily say this has pushed us all over the edge or summat)

if they tell us to do one, we all ask the court for £9,999 each,
which i think circumvents some over-£10k-thingy.

how say you?
Click to expand...

I’m in!
 
pepguardiola'smoustache said:
well.
i have had an idea...

once the club are found to have nothing to answer for,
why don't we, the collective bluemoon members who have contributed to this thread,
commence a civil case against the premier league for damages?

i'm sure the honourable (and not so honourable) posters on here (we all know who i'm talking about) could muster up the necessary legal specifics between themselves to bring it to court.

i believe we'd have to first formally write to the fuckers and ask for a reply with 14 days to our claim for initial compo otherwise we'll take them to the cleaners.

this thread alone certainly must be extremely strong evidence that the whole 115 thing has made us all into mentalists from the stress of it.
(i realise most of us were already lunatics anyway but we could easily say this has pushed us all over the edge or summat)

if they tell us to do one, we all ask the court for £9,999 each,
which i think circumvents some over-£10k-thingy.

how say you?
Click to expand...
Watching with interest!
 
petrusha said:
Exactly. Laughable that Arsenal fans accuse us of cheating when chairman/owner Henry Norris, later banned from football for life after being found guilty of financial irregularities, bribed their way into the top flight in 1919. EVERYTHING that club has ever done since then has been achieved on the basis of cheating. Their lack of self-awareness is simply comical.
Click to expand...

Johnnyblue7 said:
View attachment 190721Now maybe I'm being a bit too touchy here but something tells me we've upset Ryan.
Click to expand...

Quote from the first Matrix movie:

1777568488198.png
 
iwasthere1968 said:
Interesting phrase used in the above " procedural violence".
Any legal eagles able to comment that there is any similar " remedy / judgement " available to the panel in our case ?
Click to expand...
Seems to suggest he was being accused of things for which he’d already been convicted whereas we’re being accused of things for which we’ve already been cleared
 
Blueboy73 said:
State of this.
I wonder what Tarquin thinks of the cash injection provided by Danny Fiszman who made his money off the back of blood diamonds to bankroll Arsene ""financial doping" Wenger in the 90's, George Graham's bungs or if Tarquin wants to go further back maybe he could comment on bribing their way into thr top flight under their first Sugar Daddy Henry Norris who was eventually banned for life.
Just a few examples of Arsenal demonstrating their "class" and "tradition"
Click to expand...
Different world football wasn't invented then, you know like the money the rags spunked on Pallester etc...fuck em all.

CTID
 
blue b4 the moon said:
Different world football wasn't invented then, you know like the money the rags spunked on Pallester etc...fuck em all.

CTID
Click to expand...
They spent more than their turnover on signing the likes of Pallister, Ince, Wallace, etc. in the late eighties.
Funnily enough nobody questioned where the money came from.
As Jim Royle would say organic club my arse.
 
Chris in London said:
because we’d lose
Click to expand...
that's your house gettin' sprayed then

maxresdefault.jpg
 
Chris in London said:
The fact you even know this exists is troubling
Click to expand...
troubling in terms of the civil case?
i'm not intending to be a witness but i'm happy for my troubles to be used as part of the defence.
(one of the posters even became a confused vandal).

if you are out, you are out, that's fine.
you've nailed your colours early doors, no worries.

i'm sure david can ask lord prannock if he'll do one of those no-win-no-fee jobbies.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top