Search results

wow, a sensible suggestion on this thread

it wont work and is bullshit anyway do you even see the parallels between FFP and what you are proposing?

they do pay and they can do what they want. who appointed you king of all the blues, able to decide what other city do or dont do? was there a vote cos i must have missed it, when are you up for re election?

it is 28th December 2022 and yes, i can confirm, he is still a **** what a fucking shock in other news..... water is still wet and ......giggsy is a wrong un

i support the right to strike in general i also support aslef in this case

so what action should they take if they are being shafted by their employers?

I apologise , as I said I just copied an pasted a reply to another poster. The other poster used lots of exclamation points etc and was clearly upset. You do however appear upset now as indicated by the use of the For Fucks Sske at the end of your post. I may be misinterpreting that and if...

they affected my life in that it was reported in the news. I didn't understand why they had done it, so asked some questions A poster kindly gave me an answer, which I accepted and thought that was it. someone then suggested I watch the docu on nextflix. I posted why i wouldnt. I used the word...

in the same way anyone who hasnt watched every man united game shouldnt have an opinion on them?

I will copy and paste my answer to another poster.... ....impinged, as in it had an effect, but only to the extent it was repeatedly in the news I watched, so I was interested. Perhaps i shouldnt have used the word impinged, it seems to have upset some posters, not sure why though. What word...

impinged, as in it had an effect, but only to the extent it was repeatedly in the news I watched, so I was interested. Perhaps i shouldnt have used the word impinged, it seems to have upset some posters, not sure why though. What word should I have used that would not have upset you?

in that it was reported in the news i watched so I became interested. Thats it. Why does your post seem so angry? Am I just reading it wrong?

not for me fella dont care what the royals do or how they deal with issues. Except when it impinges on my life as it has in the case of Meghan and harrys documentary dont care what charities the royals (inc harry and meghan) work with. I am glad they do work with charities as most charities...

thank you thats all i was asking if that is what they say they are doing, then i understand. i have very little interest in the royal family, so have watched neither the oprah interview nor the netflix series. its not just harry and Meghan, i also didnt watch the queens funeral or recent...

if that was their goal then fair enough what evidence do you have that this was their goal?

so a restatement of their position with more detail. to achieve what?

you say H & M have made this Netflix series to show their side of how they were treated by the British media and by Harry's own family. that doesnt answer the question. they had already done that with the oprah interview. what else are they hoping to achieve with this further restatement of...

because they would have to make similar statements on a daily basis on multiple issues and then if they missed one issue, they would be castigated. what would be the point and what would it achieve?

is it me or are the only people acting like dignified adults in all this are the king and royal household? by making no comment and not getting sucked into a media war the british print media are acting as expected, bottom feeding gobshites that they are i have nothing against Harry and...

he wont respond because he wont want to admit unemployment rate is the lowest since 1974.