Search results

  1. S

    Savic looks like a player we would have bought pre Abu Dhabi

    I was not one of the bandwagon booers last season regarding Savic. He even had a fairly decent pre-season. I actually fully expected him to take the leap into the first team as part of a back three against Chelsea... and how wrong I was. I can see why no one rates him. Even Mancini was...
  2. S

    Daniel Agger (continued)

    Be serious. Savic was given his big chance to finally shine on Sunday and was subbed at half time. The first half Mancini spent most of the 45 minutes berating Savic for his non-performance! I'm all for giving kids time and experience, but Savic realy looks no better than Championship...
  3. S

    Daniel Agger (continued)

    I've made my views on Agger clear, in that I don't think he's worth anything over £20m or the hassle in dealing with Liverpool. But you are deluded if you think Agger isn't in control of his own destiny here. If he really, REALLY, wants to stay at Liverpool, he only has to come out and say...
  4. S

    Adam Johnson

    Every one of the 1968 League winning team became legends. Nowadays all the football expert kids on here are all for torching them because they're "shit". Unbelievable Jeff...
  5. S

    City fans today

    Chinese gloryhunters? What the fuck has their nationality got to do with your blinkered view of what makes a City fan?
  6. S

    City fans today

    Must admit that it was a great atmosphere today. Four of us went to Brum last night and stayed over, lots of Blues in and around the canals, Broad Street and the hotel. Saw one Chelsea fan the whole time! Great support today. And we must have had two-thirds of the crowd today.
  7. S

    Daniel Agger (continued)

    I hate to tell you this, but from our recent influx of scouse posters you are easily the best! You're right, if he doesn't fancy moving on, he should be allowed to stick it out at Liverpool. It's his career. But by the same token, when we sign (for example) Gareth Barry from under the noses...
  8. S

    City agree fee for Jack Rodwell

    That's a seriously reasonable deal. Has Marwood actually negotiated a really good deal after the blasting he got from Mancini! Rodwell ticks ALL the boxes... just hope his age will allow him to improve his fitness record.
  9. S

    Daniel Agger (continued)

    That can't be right, surely? I read on here from some other scouser that Agger's views didn't come in to it... that if the owners wanted him gone he's have to go. Yeah, that surprised me as well. Slavery still alive and well on Merseyside. Who'd have thunk it, huh?
  10. S

    It's Quiet 10 no apologies! (continued)

    I like a good Indian.
  11. S

    the flapping thread.

    You've been reading too many Bourne novels mate. Mancini making Marwood look bad is a strategy? Why go through all that shit when you have a chance to clear him out while negotiating your new contract? Doesn't make sense. Maybe the owners actually support what Marwood is doing? Heaven forbid...
  12. S

    the flapping thread.

    I agree that Mancini doesn't have to like everything about the club to sign a new contract, but when one of the things he supposedly "hates" is the guy responsible for transfers, then I'm sure Mancini would have resolved this at the time of signing his new contract. It's a bit like the owners...
  13. S

    It's Quiet 10 no apologies! (continued)

    Let it go JC...
  14. S

    the flapping thread.

    But the power he had while negotiating his 5 year deal has now gone. He can't "threaten" the club over Marwood now, whereas while he held the power prior to the contract signing, he could have imposed his own demands. I'm sure he can now kick off... but the club can just ignore him now if they...
  15. S

    the flapping thread.

    If that's the case, then why not during the negotiations? It's a bit late now, isn't it? I have a sneaky feeling that Mancini likes to create an atmosphere of chaos to get the best out of his players, a siege mentality. He did it brilliantly back end of last season, even the Tevez scenario...
  16. S

    Daniel Agger (continued)

    "Buying club"? You've spend the last couple of days on here telling everyone that Agger isn't going to be sold! He doesn't want to go (how you would know that I am still uncertain of), the players don't want him to go, the manager doesn't want him to go... Yet you STILL think we'll be buying...
  17. S

    Daniel Agger (continued)

    That's brilliant then. He doesn't want to leave. All the evidence points to that fact. So why are you on here repeating this ad nauseum? Truth be told, I really wouldn't have him. So you're actually cheering me up no end by telling me he's staying. The £25m we'll save will ensure that you'll...
  18. S

    Daniel Agger (continued)

    Nah, according to YNWA aka "The Voice of The Kop" he has no choice in the matter. If the evil Yanks decide to twirl their moustaches and sell the vulnerable, innocent, Liverpool-loving young Dane against his wishes, he has to go. Cue two nights of candle-lit processions down Scotty Road all...
  19. S

    Daniel Agger (continued)

    Nah, you're not just "giving your views" on the situation. You're also telling us what sort of person Agger is. And what sort of people the owners are. As if you know them! According to you, Agger would go if he's not wanted. Aw diddums. How would you know what sort of character Agger is...
  20. S

    Daniel Agger (continued)

    They still have slavery on Merseyside then? I know your city was built on it, but surely by now they allow individuals to make their own minds up about who they work for? If Agger doesn't want to leave Liverpool, NO ONE can force him while he's under contract. So stop making stuff up. We have...

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.