Search results

Gunshots are louder

Putting aside the "assigned" stuff, your gametes determine your sex not some hospital, I am onboard with addressing a trans wo/man as a wo/man, it really doesn't matter to me and I don't think it should matter to anyone else ...but I'm not doing the whole "they" bollox, sorry.

Do you have a source for the lie regarding forced entry? The bold part is false. The nearest witness to the event said he did hear the police announce themselves. Most witnesses were woken up by the gunshots so wouldn't have heard it anyway

Best shows recently have been Dark and The Boys, imo Anyone seen them and think there's anything better atm? About to give Raised By Wolves a go. Accidentally played episode 2 and there was a war scene that looked really intriguing

Fair play to Cuomo. Even Lemon doesn't really believe Lemon here.

I've nothing to add

Tough one. Might be editing this one... Steffen Stones Ake Bellis Laporte Doyle Rodri Bernabe Torres Mahrez F Delap L Carson, Walker, Mendy, Otamendi, Foden, Braf, Sterling City 2-1

I'm not defending Trump, not even talking about him - or Biden for that matter, just stating a fact surrounding this Supreme Court controversy. Over the decades both sides have held up the "Thurmond Rule" myth when it suits and ignored it when it suits

Yes, people have babies and babies don't get to choose where to live or anything for that matter. And that proves I'm being intentionally dishonest? If it's a bad argument I'm fully on board with admitting such, it was only a preamble to a suggestion anyway. The problem is too many come...

Never said it was fine, it's just a reality and this specific argument/PR exercise about the SC has been used by both parties for decades.

Oh, have I? That's annoying :( It's true that the arrived at mph limit is variable but the argument that we need a speed limit to protect people is the same argument today as ever. And it being an old argument doesn't make it invalid

Yes, I've just had a shit, thanks. And I've dropped 1 front because it's just alot of repetition and he (you) argues in bad faith

The US has a different philosophy underpinning a different system and is a much larger and more decentralised country. And are we to believe that London hasn't been/isn't favoured? As I said earlier on the answer to influence (what is there, like 16000 permanent lobbyists in DC?) over the Fed...

Calm down, I'm 'fighting' on 3 fronts here and I also have other stuff to do like eating, shitting etc.

To quote you: "If winning the presidency and a senate majority with a minority of the votes and then using that power [...]" What etiquette was broken here? Both parties have gone down the route the GOP did in 2016 by bringing up nonsense about some mythical "rule" when blocking a nomination...

Non that I'm aware of but I'm not talking about rules, Cjn is. Nope, time hasn't changed the need for the Fed Gov to be as free from influence as possible. It's a pretty timeless concern

The strength of an argument has nothing to do with the century in which it was made. Which rules were broken?

If influence over the Fed Gov is already a problem, which most would agree that it is, the answer isn't to make it worse. I said I don't know about PR, not that I agree. Maybe I would, maybe I'd support them becoming their own country, I haven't really looked into it, just as I doubt you have...

I referenced an argument made by RBG. You're referencing a wish and as heroic as she was she is not a monarch. 2016 was pure politics, just like now. Obama didn't have the Senate and Republicans didn't want a moderate taking Scalia's slot. If the charge is hypocrisy both sides are guilty...

Threatening to essentially upend the system if a GOP Pres and GOP senate replace RBG is pretty insane. RBG herself warned the Dems not to undermine the SC in such a way