“City have made the PL uncompetitive”. Myth & reality

Prestwich_Blue

Well-Known Member
Joined
26 Jan 2006
Messages
61,738
Location
Wherever I lay my hat that's my home
I hear pundits and other fans constantly saying that the PL is becoming boring and uncompetitive due to our success so I checked the figures to see if it was. Very interesting results.

This season, after 13 games, the top 4 clubs are separated by 7 points. Here are the same figures for other seasons:
2017/18. 12 points
2016/17. 3 points
2015/16. 2 points
2014/15. 11 points
2013/14. 7 points
2012/13. 5 points
2011/12. 9 points
2010/11. 6 points
2009/10. 8 points
2008/09. 9 points
2007/08. 8 points
2006/07. 11 points
2005/06. 8 points
2004/05. 10 points
2003/04. 11 points
2003/03. 7 points
2001/02. 6 points
2000/01. 7 points

So there have only been 5 seasons this century (out of 19) where the gap between the top 4 has been less than it is currently after the equivalent number of games. And there have been double that number where it’s been higher. Out of those 10 that have seen a bigger gap, we’ve won the title twice and one of those was on goal difference. The average gap is about 7.8 points so this season isn’t even above average.
 
I think the problem some have is how few points the top 5 are dropping against the rest of the league (less than 10 so far I think), but it's pointless to blame that on City.
 
I think the problem some have is how few points the top 5 are dropping against the rest of the league (less than 10 so far I think), but it's pointless to blame that on City.

Liverpool, Chelsea and Tottenham have had their best start to a season. Yet, it is only City that made the league uncompetitive. How about Liverpool who brought in 250m players in 2018 and have 33 points from a possible 39 ?
 
3 teams made it 1/3 of the way through the season unbeaten. No one outside the top6 has beaten a club inside the top 6. At it's heart the league is not competitive in the "anyone can beat anyone" way it was a few years ago.

Guardiola has raised the level of what's considered excellence in this league. If Liverpool, Chelsea etc trying to match that makes the league uncompetitive then it's really an indictment of how things were before. How much the big clubs were pissing about beforehand and how the smaller clubs have not caught up.
 
Liverpool, Chelsea and Tottenham have had their best start to a season. Yet, it is only City that made the league uncompetitive. How about Liverpool who brought in 250m players in 2018 and have 33 points from a possible 39 ?
I wouldn't blame any of the top 5 mate, the increased TV money has made things like gate receipts, commercial income and CL money the least decisive they've ever been in terms of spending power. The rest of the league need to get their act together and improve on recruitment.
I mean ffs Atletico Madrid have less money than most of the PL teams, but they have no problem competing both on the domestic and European stage.
 
If Chelsea, City and Leicester hadn’t successfully invested, the league would be one of the most boring ones in the world and the broadcasting rights would be worth an awful lot less. That’s without mentioning the aesthetic value that City have provided, probably playing the most beautiful football the league has ever seen with probably the league’s greatest ever team.
 
I wouldn't blame any of the top 5 mate, the increased TV money has made things like gate receipts, commercial income and CL money the least decisive they've ever been in terms of spending power. The rest of the league need to get their act together and improve on recruitment.
I mean ffs Atletico Madrid have less money than most of the PL teams, but they have no problem competing both on the domestic and European stage.

Napoli have the same budget as Burnley.

Let that sink in.

The premier league's lower half has been pissing away money for the last 5 years, keeping the standards the same while the money has ballooned.

Hopefully teams like Watford, Bournemouth and Everton are leading a charge of modtable sodes who realose that by just beong competent they can guarantee safety and maybe sneak into Europe.

I think we're seeing the end of twats like Pulis, Pardew and Hughes, to be replaced by gifted European coaches who can make use of the incredible amount of money they have access to.
 
Napoli have the same budget as Burnley.

Let that sink in.

The premier league's lower half has been pissing away money for the last 5 years, keeping the standards the same while the money has ballooned.

Hopefully teams like Watford, Bournemouth and Everton are leading a charge of modtable sodes who realose tjat by just beong competent they can guarantee safety and maybe sneak into Europe.
Add Fulham and Wolves to that group, things might not have started as well for them but at least they're showing ambition.
 
Napoli have the same budget as Burnley.

Let that sink in.

The premier league's lower half has been pissing away money for the last 5 years, keeping the standards the same while the money has ballooned.

Hopefully teams like Watford, Bournemouth and Everton are leading a charge of modtable sodes who realose that by just beong competent they can guarantee safety and maybe sneak into Europe.

I think we're seeing the end of twats like Pulis, Pardew and Hughes, to be replaced by gifted European coaches who can make use of the incredible amount of money they have access to.
you need to change your batteries :)
 
We are spending similar amounts now , as we have since the takeover , the difference is Pep , he's the best in the business. Pundits frequently say anybody could manage our club because of the quality of the players , which is absolute bollocks , if Sam Allardyce took over tomorrow we would be f*cked. Its no coincidence that Pep made Spain and Germany "uncompetitive" when he was manager at Barca & Bayern , he's doing the same in England but now its more of an achievement because he's doing it with "Likkle Citeh".
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top