So it's still not been answered wether the club have brought this idea in or our reps, also which has been asked will this apply to Corporate?
Even if they give you a better chance?Personally don’t get the chance to do aways as I don’t normally meet the criteria. But having said that think the ID checks is wrong. Not a criticism of the committee though. Just think they are making decisions without engaging the fans they represent. But do wish you all good luck with it.
So it's still not been answered wether the club have brought this idea in or our reps, also which has been asked will this apply to Corporate?
When you buy a ticket you implicitly agree to be bound by the rules that pertain to that purchase, like every other ticket you buy. The club have openly said to us that they don’t want another Glasgow shambles. You appear to be broadly supportive of the concept of people buying tickets that they’re going to use, but some people will still buy tickets to pass on.
In fact the rationale for the 18-25 ballot (and they’ll probably be the group disproportionately checked) is that the anecdotal evidence we had suggested that many in this group were getting tickets from their dads/uncles/dads or uncles’ mates/their mates etc. So they would be the ones most affected as a group.
Plus I doubt the club (who were most keen on the ID check idea) probably wouldn’t run these at games like next week’s, where they’ve gone to low points. I’d also say that if the checks weren’t picking up any or many abuses over the course of a season then I’d support dropping them.
Even if they give you a better chance?
How do you get your tickets is it via the loyalty system or through corporate ?
If it's the latter will you mind picking it up ?
Why do it in the first place?When you buy a ticket you implicitly agree to be bound by the rules that pertain to that purchase, like every other ticket you buy. The club have openly said to us that they don’t want another Glasgow shambles. You appear to be broadly supportive of the concept of people buying tickets that they’re going to use, but some people will still buy tickets to pass on.
In fact the rationale for the 18-25 ballot (and they’ll probably be the group disproportionately checked) is that the anecdotal evidence we had suggested that many in this group were getting tickets from their dads/uncles/dads or uncles’ mates/their mates etc. So they would be the ones most affected as a group.
Plus I doubt the club (who were most keen on the ID check idea) probably wouldn’t run these at games like next week’s, where they’ve gone to low points. I’d also say that if the checks weren’t picking up any or many abuses over the course of a season then I’d support dropping them.
If those work, as I said, then I’d be delighted to see the back of ID checks. But the rags have had them for a while and, as far as I can see, their fans accept them.I think the bigger issue is platinum mate (which I know you are trying to stop) and also giving points for away tickets. I would hope that would stop the points whores. But I guess we will find out mate.
Because most coaches organise a day out and don't arrive at the ground until near the kick off time.Mayo organises a coach. The coach will park up near the ground. What’s the problem? At some point everyone has to go to the ground. If you’ve got nothing to hide it won’t be a problem but it’s an indisputable fact there’s quite a few games that mayo31 is offering spares for on here. So how does he come by these?
I know for sure there’s more than a few hypocrites on here who regularly buy tickets on cards belonging to family or friends for mates who don’t have the points. I’ve personally witnessed a conversation between 4 people who had 10 tickets between them deciding who gets the other 6. It’s people like that you want to blame for this, not the CM committee, me or the club.