Indaparkside
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 28 Dec 2015
- Messages
- 14,803
He doesn’t set his own price but yesterday illustrated where the £100 million should have gone on a top centre forward we’d have been 3 up at half time
It might possibly have done if it was one or the other, but it wasn't. He's a very good player and when he settles in ill be a very important player. He already has been in some games.He doesn’t set his own price but yesterday illustrated where the £100 million should have gone on a top centre forward we’d have been 3 up at half time
Thought he was poor, If that was Sterling yesterday, he would be destroyed on here today.He was always going to be feeding off scraps yesterday. I don't think he was as bad as some are suggesting.
He isn’t a striker/false 9 though. If he has a poor game on the left or in the 8 position that’s fine but don’t understand why he played as the false 9 yesterday.Thought he was poor, If that was Sterling yesterday, he would be destroyed on here today.
Tbf neither is SterlingHe isn’t a striker/false 9 though. If he has a poor game on the left or in the 8 position that’s fine but don’t understand why he played as the false 9 yesterday.
Except playing with a CF means our whole pattern of play and approach work would be different and there's no way of knowing if we would produce the chances we do if we played with one.He doesn’t set his own price but yesterday illustrated where the £100 million should have gone on a top centre forward we’d have been 3 up at half time