FantasyIreland
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Oct 2008
- Messages
- 64,697
I'll be honest all day lad, I despise the little shit.
Thanks,lad.
I'll be honest all day lad, I despise the little shit.
Jack Grealish game changer is something I can never agree with.Yes,a game changer.He won them promotion and then carried on that form into the Prem.....they achieved results they otherwise would not have had he not been on the pitch,as it proved when he was injured.
I watched most of Villa's games,as i knew he was signing for us.
You don't like him,youre on a mission....so we will never agree :-)
Jack Grealish game changer is something I can never agree with.
Fick.Jack Grealish game changer is something I can never agree with.
If we are comparing us taking the piss out of Sancho, which I see very little of, and other fans taking the piss out of Grealish, the difference is that Jack played 26 PL games for the league winners. Sancho has not achieved that level in the PL.We as fans always look for a target of the opposition, is that not what football is all about?
What's the difference in us taking the piss out of Sancho?
He was signed for well over his true value, is he a very good player? Without a doubt for me, will he like Grealish prove value for money? The jury is very much out on both but only time will be their judge.
Agree that oppositionWe as fans always look for a target of the opposition, is that not what football is all about?
What's the difference in us taking the piss out of Sancho?
He was signed for well over his true value, is he a very good player? Without a doubt for me, will he like Grealish prove value for money? The jury is very much out on both but only time will be their judge.
Agree that opposition fans always have opposing players who are figures of ridicule or even hatred.We as fans always look for a target of the opposition, is that not what football is all about?
What's the difference in us taking the piss out of Sancho?
He was signed for well over his true value, is he a very good player? Without a doubt for me, will he like Grealish prove value for money? The jury is very much out on both but only time will be their judge.
Grealish has also been told to play differently than he did at Villa,he is under instruction not to lose the ball and instead draw the opposition and recycle possession.Grealish often stood out at Villa and City paying 100 mill. does influence opinions. Bit unfair really.
Grealish can’t help City paid 100 mill. He would be the same player if City paid 50. Or at least I like to think so.
Other than that you can only say a player is a bargain or a flop when he actually retires or moves on, and you look back to what he has achieved.
Btw if Grealish plays shite for the remainder yet scores the winning goals in the CL semi final and final as a last minute sub, what’s left of this 100 mill anyways.
The standard within the City squad is simply much higher than at Villa. Teams play differently against us. And there’s the media attention that differs a lot from other top teams by the way. You simply get treated differently in the media and therefore by opposing fans.
I never expect a new player to stand out. Haaland made a blistering start by scoring so many goals. I know, his main job. But he has plenty to work on and that’s a good thing.
Same with Grealish. He’s fitted in well. So far he is just one of many good players in our squad.
Why?I'll be honest all day lad, I despise the little shit.