mosssideblue
Well-Known Member
Foden would have been better coming on for HaalandShould have been off for foden after 60 mins when he gave the ball away for the 6th time in the second half alone.
Foden would have been better coming on for HaalandShould have been off for foden after 60 mins when he gave the ball away for the 6th time in the second half alone.
They put on a new RB against him in the 2nd half. We cannot put on a new LB or a new LCM to support him. That is the difference.Good first, average second. Lost the ball a few times in places he shouldn’t be losing it. I still think we lack something when both he and Mahrez play.
You just have an agenda against Grealish.Should have been off for foden after 60 mins when he gave the ball away for the 6th time in the second half alone.
Yes. Grealish was the problem. Apart from making the goal and being the only proactive attacker.Should have been off for foden after 60 mins when he gave the ball away for the 6th time in the second half alone.
I have seen it said on here many times that Grealish can’t play at 8. Maybe those people would be proven right, but I fail to see how Grealish could currently be worse there than Gundo. It would also take a shitload of pressure off Grealish to provide G/A and give us the opportunity to get a far more dynamic Foden out wide, who would hopefully be able to provide for Haaland.Would like to see him in the middle and add a bit of impetus to our play.
You dont half talk a load of bollocks.Should have been off for foden after 60 mins when he gave the ball away for the 6th time in the second half alone.
What agenda? For saying he should have been subbed? Are you right in the head? I said mahrez should have been subbed too in his thread despite him scoring, do I have an agenda against him too? You going to post the same thing in his thread? Comments like this make it pretty clear who the person with an agenda is and it's not me.You just have an agenda against Grealish.
I call it now.
Admit it.