So the argument is that we NEED a guy next to him, at least that's what you believe Pep thinks right?Seeing as most people on here know exactly what I mean I won’t bother explaining any further.
I can’t be arsed explaining the entire midfields roles Just because you can’t see the issue
If you don’t think Rodri is a problem that’s fine.
Last season there were plenty of games, including games that we won playing great attacking football, where he was played on his own behind Silva and De Bruyne.
As a matter of fact, the majority of games where he played in a double pivot were the games without Silva.
It's only at the end of last season once Silva's presence had diminished, and now that he's gone, that we have committed full time to the two DMs strategy. We know how good he was for us, and quite frankly I'd argue that there are extremely few players in world football that could ever play the role Silva did for us as effectively as he did. We've got players with smart movement in attacking areas (Sterling), with great technique (Foden, Bernardo), with intelligent passing games (Gundogan). But nobody who can do it all like he did.
Is it not at all possible, that actually Rodri doesn't NEED a DM partner, but in fact City need two DMs as there's nobody that can currently satisfyingly occupy the Silva role higher up?