194.5m losses 2010/2011

tolmie's hairdoo said:
Next set of accounts will stun and shut up a lot of people, Barring a couple of upcoming announcements in the pipe...it really is as simple as this.


Champions League revenues/TV/qualification points circa £30-35m - CHECK

Premier League winners/runners up - £42-£50m - CHECK

Etihad Stadium rights and shirt sponsorship - £35m - CHECK

Season ticket revenues/gate receipts - £20m - CHECK

Other related media partners - £15m - CHECK

Jerome Boateng sale - £10-11m - CHECK

Carlos Tevez - sale - upwards of £20m - CHECK

SWP - sale - £3m - CHECK

Tevez fines - £1m plus - CHECK

Shay Given sale - £4m - CHECK


THAT'S £190M RIGHT THERE...before winning any other trophy, selling any other player in January outside of Tevez.

Oh, and before we decide to start printing money with whatever the leisure destination will be.

Fucking geniuses these guys, don't let anybody tell you otherwise.

This does it for me and my sentiments as well, a pleasure to do business with you tolm
 
tolmie's hairdoo said:
Next set of accounts will stun and shut up a lot of people, Barring a couple of upcoming announcements in the pipe...it really is as simple as this.


Champions League revenues/TV/qualification points circa £30-35m - CHECK

Etihad Stadium rights and shirt sponsorship - £35m - CHECK
Both of those are mostly "new money" so just add them to the £153m we turned over this year. We should be showing something in the region of £230m turnover in the next accounts. We will still show a loss but virtually all of that will be down to player amortisation I believe.
 
But the first break-even target is a two year deficit of 45 Million Euros. Is that achievable?

Even if not, significant progress from a £195m loss is inevitable, and the regulations state "An improving trend in the annual breakeven results will be viewed more favourably than a worsening trend."
 
Marvin said:
But the first break-even target is a two year deficit of 45 Million Euros. Is that achievable?

Even if not, significant progress from a £195m loss is inevitable, and the regulations state "An improving trend in the annual breakeven results will be viewed more favourably than a worsening trend."

I wouldnt worry mate we will just have to take some fines for the first few years and then hopefully platini will choke on his mothers cock one Sunday and the keep the small clubs down rule will be a bad memory
 
Marvin said:
But the first break-even target is a two year deficit of 45 Million Euros. Is that achievable?
Yes I believe so. Been doing some quick calculations to keeo me occupied before I set off for the game and I believe our adjusted results for FFPR will all be positive.

2011/12
Result per accounts -£85m
FFPR adjustment +£120m (possibly conservative)
FFPR result £35m profit


2012/13
Result per accounts -£20m
FFPR adjustment +£30m
FFPR result £10m profit

That means our first FFPR assessment in 2013/14 will show a surplus of £45m. PASS

2013/14
Result per accounts +£15m
FFPR adjustment +£20m
FFPR result £35m profit

Therefore our second FFPR assessment in 2014/15 will show a surplus of £80m. PASS

Obviously these figures are best guesses but I was close with my "back of an envelope" figure for this years so feel reasoanbly happy with them plus there's a large margin for error in these.

So should be no problem at all.
 
Prestwich_Blue said:
Marvin said:
But the first break-even target is a two year deficit of 45 Million Euros. Is that achievable?
Yes I believe so. Been doing some quick calculations to keeo me occupied before I set off for the game and I believe our adjusted results for FFPR will all be positive.

2011/12
Result per accounts -£85m
FFPR adjustment +£120m (possibly conservative)
FFPR result £35m profit


2012/13
Result per accounts -£20m
FFPR adjustment +£30m
FFPR result £10m profit

That means our first FFPR assessment in 2013/14 will show a surplus of £45m. PASS

2013/14
Result per accounts +£15m
FFPR adjustment +£20m
FFPR result £35m profit

Therefore our second FFPR assessment in 2014/15 will show a surplus of £80m. PASS

Obviously these figures are best guesses but I was close with my "back of an envelope" figure for this years so feel reasoanbly happy with them plus there's a large margin for error in these.

So should be no problem at all.

Where does your £120m FFPR adjustment come from?
 
cibaman said:
Prestwich_Blue said:
Marvin said:
But the first break-even target is a two year deficit of 45 Million Euros. Is that achievable?
Yes I believe so. Been doing some quick calculations to keeo me occupied before I set off for the game and I believe our adjusted results for FFPR will all be positive.

2011/12
Result per accounts -£85m
FFPR adjustment +£120m (possibly conservative)
FFPR result £35m profit


2012/13
Result per accounts -£20m
FFPR adjustment +£30m
FFPR result £10m profit

That means our first FFPR assessment in 2013/14 will show a surplus of £45m. PASS

2013/14
Result per accounts +£15m
FFPR adjustment +£20m
FFPR result £35m profit

Therefore our second FFPR assessment in 2014/15 will show a surplus of £80m. PASS

Obviously these figures are best guesses but I was close with my "back of an envelope" figure for this years so feel reasoanbly happy with them plus there's a large margin for error in these.

So should be no problem at all.

Where does your £120m FFPR adjustment come from?
Wages for players under contracts signed prior to June 1st 2010. Possibly £80m although could be much more.

Amortisation on players held for sale - £20-25m

Spending on youth development, community and infrastructure - £15m.
 
Season ticket revenues/gate receipts - £20m - CHECK


I have asked this question earlier on this forum aswell but never got a satisfactory answer . Maybe those blues who are from Manchester may throw some light on this . Liverpool is not as big as Manchester and liverpool are not in CL aswell . Then how do they generate around 40m - 50 m whereas we despite having a bigger stadium only generate 20 mil . Rags only have 30 k more than us but they generate 125 mil !! i understand higher prices in london but why do we generate so less compared to Liverpud and rags :( .
 
babua_blue said:
Season ticket revenues/gate receipts - £20m - CHECK

I have asked this question earlier on this forum aswell but never got a satisfactory answer . Maybe those blues who are from Manchester may throw some light on this . Liverpool is not as big as Manchester and liverpool are not in CL aswell . Then how do they generate around 40m - 50 m whereas we despite having a bigger stadium only generate 20 mil . Rags only have 30 k more than us but they generate 125 mil !! i understand higher prices in london but why do we generate so less compared to Liverpud and rags :( .

Prices and corperate, if anything, see it as a positive, we still have many area's we can improve regarding revenue.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.