Bigga
Well-Known Member
Just to be clear, I don't like any Pres that doesn't put a cat on display.
Even if they have to grab one...
Even if they have to grab one...
Tbh, I don’t trust nor like anyone that doesn’t like dogs anyway.
The first post-debate poll just came out with Biden +13. Hard to say whether it's an outlier or not without seeing others but it suggests that people were rightly horrified with whatever that was the other night.
Biden is still leading in the polls, and voters say he won his first debate against Trump
The first scientific polls to ask who won the debate Tuesday night show Biden coming out on top.www.cnbc.com
I was going to comment on this but all I have are a series of anecdotes from focus groups conducted after the debate and a rash of Twitter commentary -- it looks like a good-sized portion of that small sliver of undecideds were appalled by Trump's 1) overall behavior, 2) the refusal to condemn white supremacy (which is how they saw it WITHOUT a media filter, Damo) and 3) the attacks on Biden's kid (again, as they saw it). Some wanted Biden to show more "attack dog" to combat Trump's behavior but others lauded Biden for not going over there and strangling him or walking off the stage. Additional anecdotes suggest Trump signs being removed from lawns all over the country on Wednesday morning, but there's no data obviously.
Recall Trump's press conferences aren't prime time, aren't necessarily about topics of interest, and the snippets you see of him in the MSM and otherwise of him speaking are just that -- snippets -- easy to dismiss or ignore. Not the debate. Prime time, with his opponent right there, unvarnished and unedited. And it seems clear from the initial reaction that many folks were greatly disturbed by what they saw.
There's a lot of time left and anything can happen and there are two more debates but my initial visceral reaction from the last 36 hours is that his performance has harmed his chances greatly.
I was going to comment on this but all I have are a series of anecdotes from focus groups conducted after the debate and a rash of Twitter commentary -- it looks like a good-sized portion of that small sliver of undecideds were appalled by Trump's 1) overall behavior, 2) the refusal to condemn white supremacy (which is how they saw it WITHOUT a media filter, Damo) and 3) the attacks on Biden's kid (again, as they saw it). Some wanted Biden to show more "attack dog" to combat Trump's behavior but others lauded Biden for not going over there and strangling him or walking off the stage. Additional anecdotes suggest Trump signs being removed from lawns all over the country on Wednesday morning, but there's no data obviously.
Recall Trump's press conferences aren't prime time, aren't necessarily about topics of interest, and the snippets you see of him in the MSM and otherwise of him speaking are just that -- snippets -- easy to dismiss or ignore. Not the debate. Prime time, with his opponent right there, unvarnished and unedited. And it seems clear from the initial reaction that many folks were greatly disturbed by what they saw.
There's a lot of time left and anything can happen and there are two more debates but my initial visceral reaction from the last 36 hours is that his performance has harmed his chances greatly.
I mentioned this before the debate as well, generally speaking when people get a lot of unfiltered Trump they don't like what they hear. For all the talk about the liberal media, the media sanitizes him more than anyone I can recall. Any time he gets up there just to speak off the cuff when a lot of people are watching, be it the debates in 2016 or his disastrous Coronavirus press conferences, his numbers go down afterwards.I was going to comment on this but all I have are a series of anecdotes from focus groups conducted after the debate and a rash of Twitter commentary -- it looks like a good-sized portion of that small sliver of undecideds were appalled by Trump's 1) overall behavior, 2) the refusal to condemn white supremacy (which is how they saw it WITHOUT a media filter, Damo) and 3) the attacks on Biden's kid (again, as they saw it). Some wanted Biden to show more "attack dog" to combat Trump's behavior but others lauded Biden for not going over there and strangling him or walking off the stage. Additional anecdotes suggest Trump signs being removed from lawns all over the country on Wednesday morning, but there's no data obviously.
Recall Trump's press conferences aren't prime time, aren't necessarily about topics of interest, and the snippets you see of him in the MSM and otherwise of him speaking are just that -- snippets -- easy to dismiss or ignore. Not the debate. Prime time, with his opponent right there, unvarnished and unedited. And it seems clear from the initial reaction that many folks were greatly disturbed by what they saw.
There's a lot of time left and anything can happen and there are two more debates but my initial visceral reaction from the last 36 hours is that his performance has harmed his chances greatly.
For the pseudo’s on here. Why can’t she just say “yes”?
Also he's a British and Canadian citizen and was born in the UK; thanks a lot :) More calls for his deportation recently; I'm not sure how that works but it wouldn't sadden me to see him sent packing.