Status
Not open for further replies.
But what do you suggest? If the President isn't going to abide by the rules, laws, traditions, and history of his predecessors, and his party is going to be complicit in ignoring them and enable such, what Constitution is fit for purpose? Anyhow, I'm not sure I agree -- the courts are doing what they are supposed to thus far; this isn't going anywhere. It's a pantomime. A pantomime that will allow Trump and his supporters to live in a fantasy land where they had the election stolen. And -- far more importantly -- will allow Trump and those in on the Trump con to fleece the snot out of the hapless.
What use is your right to bear arms, if you’re not allowed shoot the ****?

2nd amendment, my arse.
 
Ummmmm, mate, if the evidence cited for the conclusion that the system is insecure in Michigan comes entirely from "data" from townships in FUCKING MINNESOTA, I don't think we really need to concern ourselves with trusting the remainder of what this consultant errrr liar errrr fraud errrr grifter errr human piece of giraffe shit wrote.
He's bad at geography doesn't mean he is bad at computers. My main reason to ask is I am friends with a Trumper who uncritically repeats all of his election claims. I'd like to be able to challenge his assertions
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.