Dumb, eh?African Americans often dumbly vote Democratic consistently against their stated interests...
Dumb, eh?African Americans often dumbly vote Democratic consistently against their stated interests...
The underdogs......
"We want Hope", apparently. Very, very odd
"We want Hope", apparently. Very, very odd
United beat us a couple of times last year.Because if you don't engage you end up being irrelevant, and I know of no victory ever won by the irrelevant.
I stand to be corrected but the bit that I saw was Trump telling the interviewer that he had denounced white supremacy but didn't actually say "I denounce white supremacy" So even whilst making a statement that he should have made much earlier (obviously) he managed to squeeze in yet another lie.Anyway, I note that #45 has denounced White supremacy 3 times in his town hall and that's hardly resonated on here.
Not that I give a fuck about the guy and it's too little too late, but as even handed as opinion supposed to be, I'm not surprised it's not been mentioned.
Actually, rather than financial oppression being separate, it's intertwined within a system, which makes it a byproduct of the results of that system. However, I'm happy not to 'dig into the weeds' overly so on that subject matter.Whether financial oppression stands alone or is a result of racism is a topic for another thread.
What I would say, and I'm sure this will come as no surprise to you, is the black community is not homogeneous. I've seen some real ding dongs between the Nigerian and Afro-Caribbean community and of course there are many black folk who do not define themselves by the colour of their skin.
What I would say is the root cause of so much friction you encounter in here, is your outright rejection of the existing political system.
The system may well be shot to fuck, but it's the only game in town, you have to engage with it.
Because if you don't engage you end up being irrelevant, and I know of no victory ever won by the irrelevant.
There are times when one can see a bridge that can be crossed, where it looks a certain bridge to relative safety.The main reason is that his candidate lost and he wasn't happy. But in that saltiness there are nuggets of truths.
No, Doc, he denounced it three times. I watched it back again for confirmation. On his third denouncement he called out 'ANTIFA' for parity (I know he still doesn't get, but that's not the point).I stand to be corrected but the bit that I saw was Trump telling the interviewer that he had denounced white supremacy but didn't actually say "I denounce white supremacy" So even whilst making a statement that he should have made much earlier (obviously) he managed to squeeze in yet another lie.
United beat us a couple of times last year.
Fair enough, as I said I didn't hear the whole thing. Cheers B.No, Doc, he denounced it three times. I watched it back again for confirmation. On his third denouncement he called out 'ANTIFA' for parity (I know he still doesn't get, but that's not the point).
As you know, I have no love for him, but if it's the game he has to play, he's played it and it's all gone quiet.
That's a very convoluted analogy, However accurate.There are times when one can see a bridge that can be crossed, where it looks a certain bridge to relative safety.
Let's say Sanders was that bridge and a rope bridge at that. Not perfect, but safe enough to cross at.
When that bridge is literally burned and you're presented with a Biden bridge that was built from an old rotten and decaying tree, whose 'new' platform promises to carry your weight, you become less certain of the outcome of that crossing because of the pitfalls yet to present themselves.
You know it's going to happen, you just don't know when.
That's the Dem party promise in a nutshell.
That's all well and good but Trump's bridge is a single plank, that only reaches half way into the river, but he promises it will end up looking like the Golden Gate, honest. Probably better, as his earlier promises have prov... actually don't look at the earlier promises, but that plank is the best plank.There are times when one can see a bridge that can be crossed, where it looks a certain bridge to relative safety.
Let's say Sanders was that bridge and a rope bridge at that. Not perfect, but safe enough to cross at.
When that bridge is literally burned and you're presented with a Biden bridge that was built from an old rotten and decaying tree, whose 'new' platform promises to carry your weight, you become less certain of the outcome of that crossing because of the pitfalls yet to present themselves.
You know it's going to happen, you just don't know when.
That's the Dem party promise in a nutshell.
Anyway, I note that #45 has denounced White supremacy 3 times in his town hall and that's hardly resonated on here.
Not that I give a fuck about the guy and it's too little too late, but as even handed as opinion supposed to be, I'm not surprised it's not been mentioned.
No, Trump is the best plank, the biggest and GREATEST plank EVER.....That's all well and good but Trump's bridge is a single plank, that only reaches half way into the river, but he promises it will end up looking like the Golden Gate, honest. Probably better, as his earlier promises have prov... actually don't look at the earlier promises, but that plank is the best plank.
So many people say so. They come up to me and say “Sir, we’ve never seen a plank quite like you”No, Trump is the best plank, the biggest and GREATEST plank EVER.....