FogBlueInSanFran
Well-Known Member
Masturbating on the thread is gross. And it must be frustrating, and hurt, when nothing comes out.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
2020 US Elections
- Thread starter SebastianBlue
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Trevor Morley's Tache
Well-Known Member
How are you still trying to argue that Trump may still have a right to govern after everything that has happened in the last 4 years?The way the questions are being framed sometimes is often disingenuous.
1.) You don't need "widespread voter fraud" which by the way has no real meaning or definition. It's just a made up phrase that can be used to dismiss evidence by claiming it's not widespread. What constitutes widespread and why is that what's required. No one ever asks :?
2.) What you should need or be required is evidence of Irregularities or fraud affecting a significant enough number of votes that is larger than the margin of victory in a particular state.
3.) Now when stated in clear and actionable terms as above in 2, there is evidence in at least 2 States, Michigan and Georgia that meets that standard.
4.) Many of the claims that have been tossed by the Supreme Court, should have been tossed regardless of it's merit.
5) If for example, you don't have Standing to bring a lawsuit, it doesn't matter what the merits of your claims are, it should and often does get tossed.
For example, if your friend's car was smahed and you have video evidence of this, you can't sue the perpetrator for smashing your friend's car, just because you think what he did was is wrong. You don't have Standing. Only your friend has standing to press charges. So if you Syed, because you thought you'd friend was being a wimp for not saying, your case will be tossed. Regardless of the evidence you have.
5.) For a lot of these cases, the Supreme Court is Not the right Court to answer these cases. Thankfully the Justices understand this. And the Activists agree coz it suits them :)
I know for most who believe there is no evidence of fraud, they also don't check.
The evidence presented at the Georgia Senate (video of continued vote counting after telling everyone they were done counting for the night and the poll watchers and media left) to me is CLEAR evidence of an Irregularity which contravenes the election laws of Georgia.
Now I can dismiss word of mouth claims, but I can't dismiss the unexplained reason for continuing to count votes after stopping and telling everyone you were done for the night, then waiting till everyone left, before continuing to count. I simply can't!
Seriously, what the f*ck is wrong with you?
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
What sort of sad **** washes dishes under their wife’s supervision?
M
M
mat
Guest
Trump fans?What sort of sad **** washes dishes under their wife’s supervision?
Trevor Morley's Tache
Well-Known Member
He is f*cking minced.
andyhinch
Well-Known Member
He is f*cking minced.
I’ll take the piss at the first opportunity but that just looks out of sync
55yr old teenager
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Apr 2017
- Messages
- 2,152
He was interviewing him because he was one of the few Republicans prepared to go on the show and give his opinion. The rest of the GOP are too cowardly to put their heads above the parapet and face a few questions on their stance of why they are supporting Trump in his war on American democracyYes Trevor, that interview. I must be terrible at communicating...
In layman's terms this is the crux of that man's answer:
"I personally don't have evidence of election fraud in other States. But I believe my colleagues in those States who claim there is fraud and evidence of it."
So, yes Trevor... He didn't have any evidence personally." Why would he?
Why CNN is interviewing a legislator who isn't from.any of the States where claims of Fraud were made is a question someone should probably ask... But hey, maybe not here :)
Where have I argued that?. What the fuck is wrong with you? Stay within the confines of the opinions expressed. This is tiring!How are you still trying to argue that Trump may still have a right to govern after everything that has happened in the last 4 years?
Seriously, what the f*ck is wrong with you?
ChicagoBlue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 10 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 21,707
You can say that again!This is tiring!
4 yrs of absolute bullshit, we have an election, he gets absolutely HAMMERED, and he is STILL BEGGING to have someone, ANYONE, overturn the election!
Tiring and tiresome! The Electoral College can’t come soon enough...and it wouldn’t surprise me at all if some loon tries something with that, too!
Undemocratic, unAmerican Autocratic bullshit...yes, the 4 yrs have been VERY tiring!
andyhinch
Well-Known Member
But in alternative universe ?He was interviewing him because he was one of the few Republicans prepared to go on the show and give his opinion. The rest of the GOP are too cowardly to put their heads above the parapet and face a few questions on their stance of why they are supporting Trump in his war on American democracy
andyhinch
Well-Known Member
Why bother with him ? I don’t put him on ignore for comedy valueYou can say that again!
4 yrs of absolute bullshit, we have an election, he gets absolutely HAMMERED, and he is STILL BEGGING to have someone, ANYONE, overturn the election!
Tiring and tiresome! The Electoral College can’t come soon enough...and it wouldn’t surprise me at all if some loon tries something with that, too!
Undemocratic, unAmerican Autocratic bullshit...yes, the 4 yrs have been VERY tiring!
The evidence presented at the Georgia Senate (video of continued vote counting after telling everyone they were done counting for the night and the poll watchers and media left) to me is CLEAR evidence of an Irregularity which contravenes the election laws of Georgia.
Now I can dismiss word of mouth claims, but I can't dismiss the unexplained reason for continuing to count votes after stopping and telling everyone you were done for the night, then waiting till everyone left, before continuing to count. I simply can't!
I'm pretty sure this has already been debunked so you can dismiss it now.
ChicagoBlue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 10 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 21,707
Isn’t it funny how we have law enforcement, the State and Federal courts, and even THE REPUBLICANS RUNNING THE ELECTION saying it’s all legal and above board, yet there’s a clip on YouTube and a guy on a Football Fan Forum who know better?!I'm pretty sure this has already been debunked so you can dismiss it now.
Amazing work! HAHAHAHAHA!
andyhinch
Well-Known Member
They’ll be bumping into some who met a mermaid next who isn’t convincedIsn’t it funny how we have law enforcement, the State and Federal courts, and even THE REPUBLICANS RUNNING THE ELECTION saying it’s all legal and above board, yet there’s a clip on YouTube and a guy on a Football Fan Forum who know better?!
Amazing work! HAHAHAHAHA!
FogBlueInSanFran
Well-Known Member
The stupidest thing is that the smart ones who spout this bullshit are getting something out of it because they're in on the grift. This poster is a "believer" FOR FREE.Isn’t it funny how we have law enforcement, the State and Federal courts, and even THE REPUBLICANS RUNNING THE ELECTION saying it’s all legal and above board, yet there’s a clip on YouTube and a guy on a Football Fan Forum who know better?!
Amazing work! HAHAHAHAHA!
Imagine if City went 60 matches 1-59 -- do ya think he'd be like "Just you wait, fellows, it will all come around! I know there's evidence that we're a contending side in there somewhere."
It is just unbelievable to me the mental gymnastics some human beings will go through to avoid admitting they totally fucked up and/or what they believed once isn't true. They can't recognize lies because they lie to themselves, every hour of every day.
The more obvious it becomes, the stupider they look, and the more gymnastics they have to do to try to convince everyone -- including themselves -- that they were right.
It must be a dire life.
Well, fair enough.He was interviewing him because he was one of the few Republicans prepared to go on the show and give his opinion. The rest of the GOP are too cowardly to put their heads above the parapet and face a few questions on their stance of why they are supporting Trump in his war on American democracy
Again, this is an issue of evidence: Here is what we have in GeorgiaI'm pretty sure this has already been debunked so you can dismiss it now.
A video showing someone saying something to reporters and poll watchers, and then everyone clearing out. Except for four people who stayed back waited until everyone left . Then they went to a particular table, pulled out ballot boxes and started counting votes again.
That video was played in the Georgia State Evidentiary hearing. I watched it. You can too. It's not some crackpot making shit up on YouTube.
That video was supported by by 2 republican poll watcher statements made under penalty of perjury, that they were told to leave by the Woman in braids we could on the video and that counting was done for the night.
Those 2 statements were further supported by Reports from MSNBC, CBS, CNN, Fox News, Local 11 in Atlanta all reporting at about 10:30pm that they've been told counting was stopped for the night and will resume at 8 am.
On the video we can see ballot counting continuing btw 10:35om to around 1am in the morning.
The Evidence debunking the above? Georgia Channel 11 called the board of elections to ask about this video showing people counting ballots after they had told everyone ballot counting was done for the night.. The response...
Well, there is nothing abnormal in the video. The poll workers said they did not tell anyone to leave. Also a poll official was there for the count. So this video doesn't show any Irregularity. Just normal vote counting. DEBUNKED!
No statements was made under oath. No explanation was giving as regards the well publicized claim that counting was done ( something every major channel reported at the time) But the conclusion. Nothing to see here.
The weight of evidence, in my opinion, does not support those who claim 'debunked!. It just doesn't.
Again, this is an issue of evidence: Here is what we have in Georgia
A video showing someone saying something to reporters and poll watchers, and then everyone clearing out. Except for four people who stayed back waited until everyone left . Then they went to a particular table, pulled out ballot boxes and started counting votes again.
That video was played in the Georgia State Evidentiary hearing. I watched it. You can too. It's not some crackpot making shit up on YouTube.
That video was supported by by 2 republican poll watcher statements made under penalty of perjury, that they were told to leave by the Woman in braids we could on the video and that counting was done for the night.
Those 2 statements were further supported by Reports from MSNBC, CBS, CNN, Fox News, Local 11 in Atlanta all reporting at about 10:30pm that they've been told counting was stopped for the night and will resume at 8 am.
On the video we can see ballot counting continuing btw 10:35om to around 1am in the morning.
The Evidence debunking the above? Georgia Channel 11 called the board of elections to ask about this video showing people counting ballots after they had told everyone ballot counting was done for the night.. The response...
Well, there is nothing abnormal in the video. The poll workers said they did not tell anyone to leave. Also a poll official was there for the count. So this video doesn't show any Irregularity. Just normal vote counting. DEBUNKED!
No statements was made under oath. No explanation was giving as regards the well publicized claim that counting was done ( something every major channel reported at the time) But the conclusion. Nothing to see here.
The weight of evidence, in my opinion, does not support those who claim 'debunked!. It just doesn't.
The video has been know about for weeks, and it had already been investigated.
The people leaving were the ones opening the ballot envelopes not the counters, they were allowed to go as their jobs were done for the night.
No announcement was made asking people to leave....Journalists on site have said they were not told or asked to leave, they were told counting was done for the night.
This is where the confusion is as after stating this the supervisor received a call telling them to continue the count, however a state monitor was present throughout
The only thing in this is that both Republican and Democratic monitors should have been called to advise the count was to resume.
With all due respect Dax there is more weighty evidence in the claims that Trump is a rapist than there is fraudulent activity in this election.
SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 90,437
Of course it’s already been debunked and presented and thrown out of court. It’s not evidence. But Dax was away in hiding when that happened and the mouth breathing fuck is refusing to give up on Trump saying in power just yet.I'm pretty sure this has already been debunked so you can dismiss it now.
I know that was claimedThe video has been know about for weeks, and it had already been investigated.
Yes, that was the claim, but it doesn't explain the woman going up to the reporters and poll watchers and telling them they were done COUNTING votes for the night. It's irrelevant who was leaving. What's relevant is what was said.The people leaving were the ones opening the ballot envelopes not the counters, they were allowed to go as their jobs were done for the night.
Yes, that's another point in dispute. But let's steel man the argument and agree no one was told to leave. They were told counting was done for the night and it would resume at 8am. What's the implication there? By the way, everyone left. Not just the poll watchers...all the reporters did too. Strangely 4 poll workers who thought vote counting was done until 8am strangely didn't move or start packing up. They just waited as the gallery cleared out.No announcement was made asking people to leave....Journalists on site have said they were not told or asked to leave, they were told counting was done for the night.
Yes, it's almost as if all the vote counters were expecting the supervisor to call..This is where the confusion is as after stating this the supervisor received a call telling them to continue the count, however a state monitor was present throughout
If the people in the room believed the vote counting was done (as they told everyone it was) why did they just all sit still and wait doing nothing as everyone started clearing out? It's almost as if they knew vote counting wasn't done at 10:30... Almost as if they had the ability to predict their supervisor calling in to continue counting minutes after everyone clears out.
Also, another point that often gets blurred is the State Monitor being present. No one points out h arrive at 11:45pm. Over an hour after the counting had commenced.
Again, at a minimum, it's strange that no one has asked for evidence nor has any been provided of the call the supervisor received that caused her to commence actions that contradicted her publicly stated claim. Who made the call, and when did the call come in? These are the types of questions a first year reporter would know to ask. Yet tons of National news reporters just don't seem interested.
Yes, you'd think they would do that right. Seeing as the call must have come in within minutes of her announcing that they were stopping the count. The story being told here without questioning is hard to believe.The only thing in this is that both Republican and Democratic monitors should have been called to advise the count was to resume.
By the way, none of the rebuttals were made under penalty of perjury. The claims by the poll watchers were.
Perhaps. But even in the rebuttal you believe, the inconsistency still persists:With all due respect Dax there is more weighty evidence in the claims that Trump is a rapist than there is fraudulent activity in this election.
"We are done counting for the night. Counting will resume at 8am" and then as soon as the crowd disperses, counting then immediately resumes.
On its face the evidence supports Irregularities.
Last edited:
- Status
- Not open for further replies.