Tuearts right boot
Well-Known Member
What about vigorously ridden horses ?? I wouldn't want to get hit by one of those again.Nope.
Speed limits apply to MOTORISED vehicles.
What about vigorously ridden horses ?? I wouldn't want to get hit by one of those again.Nope.
Speed limits apply to MOTORISED vehicles.
It's called justifying their job and justifying their wage, probably from a windowless office at the end of the corridor.As always, politicians using a law rather than putting any actual effort and money into solving the issues. Areas with high levels of road deaths (per capita) are typically rural areas where people flock there to drive like dickheads. Won't be affected by a 20mph zone in towns and cities.
Urban accidents are caused between clashes between different road users. That can be solved by effective urban design, but that's something that might take decades to implement, so isn't too appealing to a politicians who wants to be an instant hero. In the Netherlands, for example, many neighbourhoods have raised junctions which forces cars to effectively go over the pavement when they want to join the main road. It establishes is as a place for pedestrians, not cars, and creates a natural speed bump, so people naturally drive more carefully. Then add to this, the separated cycle lanes that remove clashes between cars and more vulnerable road users. I wonder how many people are injured because a cyclist is trying to get past a car that has parked in the cycle lane, or get around a bus that has to stop to pick people up. But that sort of thing involves far more work. As I said, it's much easier to just sign something into law and act like you've achieved something.
Discrete 20mph zones are fine and most sensible people support them (schools etc) but widespread application of 20mph limit is crazy. We seem to become used to abandoning consensus and imposing unwanted and unpopular restrictions representing a clear minority view - and that will not end well. Where I live, many rural A roads have had large sections where speeds are reduced to 50 mph - which is widely accepted and obeyed. Very few people speed, roads are quite narrow, lots of cyclists around and a few horses. Wholesale application of 20mph in small towns and villages would be a nightmare - pretty well everyone drives as there’s no public transport to speak of.Totally agree with 20mph on Residential streets and where there are Schools and Hospitals but there are restrictions on busy A roads too.
For context 91 people died on Welsh Roads and approximately 900 seriously injured.
The major outliers are young male drivers and Motor cyclists as a percentage of total road users.
Pilot evaluation.The town they trailed it in have unanimously said it didn't work but Drakeford refused to listen because he didn't want to hear the answer
25. They're safe.A sheep has a top speed of 20 mph.
Just sayin.
Having previously lived on Anglesey for a number of years I have absolutely no issue with the 20mph limit.Discrete 20mph zones are fine and most sensible people support them (schools etc) but widespread application of 20mph limit is crazy. We seem to become used to abandoning consensus and imposing unwanted and unpopular restrictions representing a clear minority view - and that will not end well. Where I live, many rural A roads have had large sections where speeds are reduced to 50 mph - which is widely accepted and obeyed. Very few people speed, roads are quite narrow, lots of cyclists around and a few horses. Wholesale application of 20mph in small towns and villages would be a nightmare - pretty well everyone drives as there’s no public transport to speak of.
Around 2,500 motorists are caught driving with no insurance every single month in the UK.