Fair enough regarding match fitness, the whole squad gets rotated quite regularly, but he could use more minutes, although perhaps he doens't get that many minute because of his age, something to think about.The far more logical explanation as to his 'sloppiness' is that he's short of current match fitness and practice, given the injury he's come off and the stop-start nature of his game time, rather than just lazily blaming it on his age.
Notwithstanding, give me his 'sloppiness' over the short, dour, slow, predictable passing we mainly see from our other two DM's any day, which grinds our attack to a stand still and negates the threat our front four pose. The game isn't won in the possession columns.
Fair enough regarding match fitness, the whole squad gets rotated quite regularly, but he could use more minutes, although perhaps he doens't get that many minute because of his age, something to think about.
You don't need to slag off the other midfielders to praise Dinho, it makes your arguments incredibly biased and have less "weight" in my eyes and probably others.
Rodri and Gundogan are also very good passers, actually better than Dinho, but play to your agenda as you will.
There have been many stats posted over the last month or so showing Rodri and Gundogan as having alot of vertical/progressing passing amongst other midfielders in europe. They don't always play safe.Absolutely zero chance of that.
Good passing isn't keeping possession for the sake of it and padding your stats by being safe. It's that kind of outdated thinking that has seen us go into clear decline.
There have been many stats posted over the last month or so showing Rodri and Gundogan as having alot of vertical/progressing passing amongst other midfielders in europe. They don't always play safe.
I'm not gonna argue it, because the stats show the facts.