FromPollockToSilva
Well-Known Member
Just looked again and realized there was a second page of stats I hadn't noticed, you are absolutely correct?
At Leicester he was 9/13, not 2/6
Just looked again and realized there was a second page of stats I hadn't noticed, you are absolutely correct?
At Leicester he was 9/13, not 2/6
Sterling Silva Silva De Bruyne , and others a ll stepped up at were not the best. Someone has to take them.Can't believe he's still taking them, he was useless at them for us
Hard to put a finger on his performances over 2022. Best description I would put is he is absolutely wa nk
EdersonSterling Silva Silva De Bruyne , and others a ll stepped up at were not the best. Someone has to take them.
Ederson
9 of 13 is not good. Its mediocre at best.?
At Leicester he was 9/13, not 2/6
The poster you are replying to had the courtesy to correct a wrong info. Credit to her/him.9 of 13 is not good. Its mediocre at best.
And? I'm not allowed an opinion on the edited information? What does my opinion on the information have to do with the poster who updated it? Here we go, 2 of 6 is dreadful, 9 of 13 is better, but still mediocre at best. What is your point exactly?The poster you are replying to had the courtesy to correct a wrong info. Credit to her/him.