I don't care you give a zillion opinions/judgements.And? I'm not allowed an opinion on the edited information? What does my opinion on the information have to do with the poster who updated it? Here we go, 2 of 6 is dreadful, 9 of 13 is better, but still mediocre at best. What is your point exactly?
Someone needs to chill outAnd? I'm not allowed an opinion on the edited information? What does my opinion on the information have to do with the poster who updated it? Here we go, 2 of 6 is dreadful, 9 of 13 is better, but still mediocre at best. What is your point exactly?
What is your problem. If you're looking for a beef I suggest you go elsewhere.Someone needs to chill out
Mahrez is here to stay for a few more seasons. Get over it
Soon he will win us a game or two and threads like this recently will be cast aside
I do get your point. So credit to the poster. but you don't get my point. I'm not suggesting anything about the poster and that's why I responded to you. I'm simply making a suggestion that the revised statistics take Mahrez from poor to mediocre on PKs.I don't care you give a zillion opinions/judgements.
I'm surprised you don't get my point, which is as clear as it can be. I repeat for your convenience: my point is that the poster did not formulate any judgement. He just corrected the info given and should be credited for it. Your reply to him suggested that he formulated a judgement of some sort, which is not the case. I hope my point is clear now for you. I just wanted to give credit to that poster, nothing more nothing less.
How is my post in anyway looking for 'a beef'What is your problem. If you're looking for a beef I suggest you go elsewhere.
I’ve got fucking plenty.running out of words here