warringtonblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Nov 2010
- Messages
- 1,930
Yep, much better with the ball than without, tends to get on the wrongs side of the attacker (see Salah's goal)Fantastic footballer. Still don't trust him as a defender.
Yep, much better with the ball than without, tends to get on the wrongs side of the attacker (see Salah's goal)Fantastic footballer. Still don't trust him as a defender.
Agree but Eddie is essential to our play I'd say cancelo gives it a different dimension - when that is what is asked of him.I have him in the same bracket as Ederson. Slightly flawed in some aspects, prone to an occasional error but totally brilliant at what they do best. They both add verve, excitement and individuality to our squad.
If you want grey, regimented players who never take risks, you’re supporting the wrong club!
I think it's totally different.I have him in the same bracket as Ederson. Slightly flawed in some aspects, prone to an occasional error but totally brilliant at what they do best. They both add verve, excitement and individuality to our squad.
If you want grey, regimented players who never take risks, you’re supporting the wrong club!
Agree. I’d have him starting most games at left back but he’s a complete enigma. So much natural talent but does some bloody strange things.The biggest conundrum of a player since Ihenacho for me.
Moments of brilliance but also constant brainfarts that put the team under real danger.
I almost think he's better at LB because he's naturally a bit more cautious with his decisions.
Agree. I’d have him starting most games at left back but he’s a complete enigma. So much natural talent but does some bloody strange things.