ninjamonkey
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 18,745
No need to defend ederson to me mate, I'm routinely one of his loudest defenders on here. I agree with your assessment on the sane chance and that cross/shot from coman immediately before we scored as being good bits of goalkeeping but nothing standout.Not sure I agree he didn’t do anything you wouldn’t expect him to do, unless you mean you think he is brilliant and therefore today was par for course.
I count his intervention for Sane’s missed chance as a save, as his handling of it is what put Sane off from simply chipping him and his approach angle made a shot on the deck very low percentage.
The save for Bayern’s shot right before we scored was outstanding (and enabled the resulting counter from Stones to Kev to Haaland to Goal).
He had a few others great stops or smothers, as well.
His overall positional play has improved quite a bit in recent weeks, including delaying his charge in the box to better use his defenders and cutdown the angle for attackers running through. And we saw that throughout the match.
I have always been an Eddie defender but tonight I didn’t think I would need to do it . I thought everyone would recognise his performance as arguably the best in the match (Stones did run him close, though). Maybe even his best in the CL.
I still wouldn’t trade him for any other keeper.
He's doing that most weeks, and its often ignored when we concede from the first clear cut chance we face. It seems for some they need him to save half a dozen routine shots too which we dont normally face in order for him to avoid a bashing. Had him down as motm against leicester, he stopped us throwing away points there and whilst i think he played well last night, i don't think he was motm.