idahoblues
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Mar 2009
- Messages
- 19,410
Who would do the capping ?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
3rd unidentified object shot down, this time over Canada - P17
- Thread starter dronefromsector7G
- Start date
Mr Kobayashi
Well-Known Member
Who would do the capping ?
The crips and the bloods?
idahoblues
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Mar 2009
- Messages
- 19,410
Now you're talking!The crips and the bloods?
I'm With Stupid
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 6 May 2013
- Messages
- 19,155
Call me old-fashioned, but if you wanted to capture the balloon to find out what it was doing, is it really the best course of action to blow it up over the sea with a missile?
You are quoting one billionaire whose lost the plot. Can you name another one ?Does China cap people's wealth?
Can you hear that..? It's the world's smallest violin playing.
Mollusc has more money than he could spend in a hundred lifetimes, and has grown further detached from reality as his wealth has grown.
If his wealth was capped at 10 billion or even 50 billion, he might not have gone so far up his own arse.
The Chinese billionaires are now all being arrested as they are a threat to the bent bastards in charge.
City Hobgoblin
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 22 Feb 2014
- Messages
- 3,817
Putin is another oneYou are quoting one billionaire whose lost the plot. Can you name another one ?
The Chinese billionaires are now all being arrested as they are a threat to the bent bastards in charge.
feedmpenzaandhewillscore
Well-Known Member
Call me old-fashioned, but if you wanted to capture the balloon to find out what it was doing, is it really the best course of action to blow it up over the sea with a missile?
The balloon is flying in air space higher than civilian and military aircraft can fly in. It would be impossible to capture, by the time the helium comes out of it and it’s at a lower altitude it would be nowhere near the States.
blue b4 the moon
Well-Known Member
'merica.Call me old-fashioned, but if you wanted to capture the balloon to find out what it was doing, is it really the best course of action to blow it up over the sea with a missile?
It's great tv and makes them look proper hard.
No offence to the vast majority of our USA posters as like many of us here, we have no real input.
BlueHammer85
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 Oct 2010
- Messages
- 34,205
'merica.
It's great tv and makes them look proper hard.
No offence to the vast majority of our USA posters as like many of us here, we have no real input.
No offence because that’s totally incorrect
grunge
Well-Known Member
The balloon is flying in air space higher than civilian and military aircraft can fly in. It would be impossible to capture, by the time the helium comes out of it and it’s at a lower altitude it would be nowhere near the States.
Not quite. it was at about 39k feet, plenty of planes can and do go that high, but generally speaking it was higher than planes do choose to fly.
but there was no way they could "catch" it thats for sure. they could have used machine guns on a fighter jet to puncture the ballon and bring it down in a more controlled manor of they wanted.
Everything about they way this was handled though screams that they already know everything they needed to know about it and didnt see it as a threat.
they probably only shot it down due to the fact it go so much news time.