I know the letter of the law says you can only be spared the red card, if you're making an attempt to play the ball but isn't that a bit ridiculous when you think about it?
When can a shoulder to shoulder ever be an attempt to play the ball? That's never the intention, it's about challenging for a position to take the ball, once you have the upper hand. I can accept the red if there's consistency(might take a while to find a like for like incident I suppose) but I'm not going to pretend the overall justification for an attempted shoulder to shoulder being viewed less honest/more dangerous than a sliding tackle, makes sense to me. If both end up with the player being taken out. That's what they are essentially saying, with one being deemed a red card and one not. A shirt pull being a red is always deliberate foul play so I get calls like that but this just seems a bit harsh.
He should have just left the player and let him score and I know he's prone to bad decision making but I feel his intentions were obvious there.
I had some Liverpool fan fuming about my opinion that a red was harsh(how dare I) even if I accept it's the letter of the law. This on the basis of players needing to be within playing distance of the ball, if a shoulder to shoulder is to be deemed honest. He argued the attacker was but Cancelo wasn't. I'm not sure this is what the rules say but I humoured him because this isn't what I saw from the replay. I saw Cancelo being close enough to being side on, that he put his left arm infront of the attacker at the first point of contact. The Fulham player instinctively adjusts and gets his right shoulder infront by leaning across to block Cancelo off/not allow him his shoulder. Which is where it all goes wrong for Cancelo.
The closest I've come to finding a rule like that is below. If you are arguing Cancelo isn't within playing distance then you can just as easily argue neither of them are which changes things slightly. I'd argue from the replay, it appears that the Fulham player's kick-on was more to his right than he wanted(so he messed that up, unless he wanted the contact), which took him further into Cancelo's path. If he kicked it on towards his left, he's heading into more space and away from Cancelo's path.
Impeding the progress of an opponent without contact
Impeding the progress of an opponent means moving into the opponent’s path to obstruct, block, slow down or force a change of direction when the ball is not within playing distance of either player.
All players have a right to their position on the field of play; being in the way of an opponent is not the same as moving into the way of an opponent.
A player may shield the ball by taking a position between an opponent and the
ball if the ball is within playing distance and the opponent is not held off with
the arms or body. If the ball is within playing distance, the player may be fairly
charged by an opponent.
Anyway, we move on. Harsh red, soft pen... everyone's happy right? Except Liverpool and Arsenal fans.
Edit: That kind of explains(I think) to me why Haaland's goal the other week was fine too because the player moved into his path to try and slow him down.