EdersonsSmiley
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Jan 2020
- Messages
- 1,141
Equally,i cant believe posters think Sterling is as good as it gets when the evidence on a weekly basis says different.
And despite attempting to address and discuss the glaring weaknesses in his game,some just point blank refuse and choose to bury their heads while claiming moral superiority.
Is this actually true though?
I haven't seen anyone say he isn't a bad finisher or he doesn't get the ball stuck under his feet at times etc
The issue is a portion of posters look at those and say clearly Sterling is shit and 'insert midtable winger' can do those things better so should replace him.
But that ignores all the good aspects of his game, he has been integral in what most people would call the greatest ever premier League team. He has been part of the attack which has scored the most goals for how many years now?
You only have to look in our own squad to see it, Mahrez has some of the best technique in the entire squad yet he is a bit part player and most people wouldn't have him in their best XI. That's because the rest of his game is so lacking 90% of the time.