Well that's not true, if many didn't think he played well we'd have seen this thread boom with 10 new pages within 20 minutes of the final whistle.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
#7 | Raheem Sterling - 2021/22 Performances
- Thread starter MAG
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
kaz7
Well-Known Member
If that was the case there would have been ten pages not two postsYou perceived he played well, many didn't
mosssideblue
Well-Known Member
Think about it.If that was the case there would have been ten pages not two posts
Had he played crap, he would have been getting pelters
Had he had a good game, he would have been getting praise
Had he performed OK, then not a lot to post about.
Didn't see many praising or giving him pelters post match.
mosssideblue
Well-Known Member
See reply to KarenWell that's not true, if many didn't think he played well we'd have seen this thread boom with 10 new pages within 20 minutes of the final whistle.
I don't buy it sadly. I know you see it otherwise but people on this forum are very quick to criticise Sterling, and that doesn't necessitate an explicitly bad performance to do so.See reply to Karen
andyhinch
Well-Known Member
He hardly got any praise on here when he’s constantly been England’s best player mate. Slabhead got more off some.Think about it.
Had he played crap, he would have been getting pelters
Had he had a good game, he would have been getting praise
Had he performed OK, then not a lot to post about.
Didn't see many praising or giving him pelters post match.
kaz7
Well-Known Member
I dont need to think about anything , you and others were missing, says it all,this is the most negative thread on the whole forum but he plays well then silenceThink about it.
Had he played crap, he would have been getting pelters
Had he had a good game, he would have been getting praise
Had he performed OK, then not a lot to post about.
Didn't see many praising or giving him pelters post match.
mosssideblue
Well-Known Member
He does get a lot of crap but I think a lot of that is caused by:I don't buy it sadly. I know you see it otherwise but people on this forum are very quick to criticise Sterling, and that doesn't necessitate an explicitly bad performance to do so.
Over zealous posters
mosssideblue
Well-Known Member
I don't watch England, but I'm not surprised people don't comment on here for non city gamesHe hardly got any praise on here when he’s constantly been England’s best player mate. Slabhead got more off some.
Yes, there are a lot of posters who could be described as over zealous in their criticism. That's the problem.He does get a lot of crap but I think a lot of that is caused by:
Over zealous posters
- Status
- Not open for further replies.