cleavers
Moderator
I thought he was mostly good too.Kovacic played really well and was a constant outlet for passes. Bet he enjoyed winning there, too.
I thought he was mostly good too.Kovacic played really well and was a constant outlet for passes. Bet he enjoyed winning there, too.
It's because we live in a world of instant gratification. No place for nuance and patience. Same with Nunes - if the team is struggling and the new signings are still finding their feet then you must immediately declare them to be shit. Then if things improve for the individual and collectively, double down on your extreme opinion and bring all kinds of personal remarks into it like how he looks or body language. Saving face is the aim of the game here. Do not entertain any thoughts of admitting you were hasty or perhaps wrong, that's too difficult.Why are you surprised? There are those married to their own agendas and they'll the same dumb shit over and over again regardless of how a guy plays...
Spot on!!It's because we live in a world of instant gratification. No place for nuance and patience. Same with Nunes - if the team is struggling and the new signings are still finding their feet then you must immediately declare them to be shit. Then if things improve for the individual and collectively, double down on your extreme opinion and bring all kinds of personal remarks into it like how he looks or body language. Saving face is the aim of the game here. Do not entertain any thoughts of admitting you were hasty or perhaps wrong, that's too difficult.
I agree, he is getting a bit of a free ride after offering next to nothing on the pitch in terms of creativity. He is stepping into some big shoes in Gundogans but so far he is way short of fulfilling that spot. Needs to improve sharpish.What does kovacic do??! Has no end product in the final 3rd, and defensively doesn’t seem to offer anything… can pass sideways yes and dribble occasionally well but we already have one passenger in the squad being grealish, can’t have 2. Enlighten me what am I missing I have never seen the hype in this guy.
I don't think anyone at City was under any illusions on Kovacic's creativity. Not sure why so many seem to think differently. He wasn't signed to replace Gundogans goals.I agree, he is getting a bit of a free ride after offering next to nothing on the pitch in terms of creativity. He is stepping into some big shoes in Gundogans but so far he is way short of fulfilling that spot. Needs to improve sharpish.
OK, please explain what was he signed to do then. He's taking up Gundogans place ?.I don't think anyone at City was under any illusions on Kovacic's creativity. Not sure why so many seem to think differently. He wasn't signed to replace Gundogans goals.
i'll tell you for nothing he'll be some player if he can do any of that from the treatment tableHasnt done it for me so far. Not sure what his role is supposed to be ? But no goals and no assists are a telling stat. A very poor immitation of Gundogan.
Well until he got injured he had started 12 league games, I know its hard to remember as he didn't exactly do alot to make you remember he was playing.i'll tell you for nothing he'll be some player if he can do any of that from the treatment table